rs55728855

chr12-109783719-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2 BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BS1 BS2

The NM_021625.5(TRPV4):c.2518G>A(p.Glu840Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0101 in 1,613,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 104 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0069 (6 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 (98 hom.)
• Consequence: TRPV4 NM_021625.5 missense
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:20
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 5.34

Genes affected

TRPV4 (HGNC:18083): (transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 4) This gene encodes a member of the OSM9-like transient receptor potential channel (OTRPC) subfamily in the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of ion channels. The encoded protein is a Ca2+-permeable, nonselective cation channel that is thought to be involved in the regulation of systemic osmotic pressure. Mutations in this gene are the cause of spondylometaphyseal and metatropic dysplasia and hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type IIC. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• PP2: Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, TRPV4
• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0075240433).
• BP6: Variant 12-109783719-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-109783719-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137726.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-109783719-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00694 (1057/152200) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0116 (787/68002). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0109. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 505 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 1057 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TRPV4	NM_021625.5	c.2518G>A	p.Glu840Lys	missense_variant	16/16	ENST00000261740.7

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TRPV4	ENST00000261740.7	c.2518G>A	p.Glu840Lys	missense_variant	16/16	1	NM_021625.5	P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00695 AC: 1057 AN: 152082 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00220

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00275

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00394

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00857

Gnomad MID AF: 0.0127

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0116

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00764

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00645 AC: 1617 AN: 250750 Hom.: 6 AF XY: 0.00667 AC XY: 905 AN XY: 135714

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00160

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00185

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.000696

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00559

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00955

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.00966

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00800

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0104 AC: 15168 AN: 1461548 Hom.: 98 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0102 AC XY: 7406 AN XY: 727056

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00146

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00241

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.000804

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000756

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00568

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0102

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0120

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00974

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00694 AC: 1057 AN: 152200 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00679 AC XY: 505 AN XY: 74386

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00219

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00275

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00173

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00395

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00857

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0116

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00756

Alfa AF: 0.00926 Hom.: 16

Bravo AF: 0.00575

TwinsUK AF: 0.0111 AC: 41

ALSPAC AF: 0.0125 AC: 48

ESP6500AA AF: 0.00318 AC: 14

ESP6500EA AF: 0.00953 AC: 82

ExAC AF: 0.00629 AC: 764

Asia WGS AF: 0.00144 AC: 5 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.00916

EpiControl AF: 0.00895

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:20

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5

Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 06, 2014	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)	Nov 13, 2015	- -

not provided Benign:4

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Apr 01, 2024	TRPV4: BP4, BS1, BS2 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics	Jun 15, 2017	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Sep 18, 2023	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2C Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Mendelics	May 28, 2019	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Feb 01, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 12, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

-

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Aug 30, 2019

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neuronopathy, distal hereditary motor, autosomal dominant 8 Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Scapuloperoneal spinal muscular atrophy Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Brachyrachia (short spine dysplasia) Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Spondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Kozlowski type Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Metatropic dysplasia Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 12, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Aug 24, 2020

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
AlphaMissense	Benign	0.23
BayesDel_addAF	Benign	-0.30	T
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.19
Cadd	Uncertain	25
Dann	Uncertain	1.0
DEOGEN2	Benign	0.40	T;T;.;.;.;.
Eigen	Uncertain	0.21
Eigen_PC	Uncertain	0.33
FATHMM_MKL	Uncertain	0.88	D
M_CAP	Benign	0.069	D
MetaRNN	Benign	0.0075	T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM	Uncertain	0.16	D
MutationAssessor	Benign	1.9	L;L;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster	Benign	0.86	D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI	Benign	0.47	T
PROVEAN	Benign	-1.6	N;N;N;N;N;N
REVEL	Benign	0.28
Sift	Uncertain	0.0070	D;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G	Uncertain	0.022	D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen		0.85	P;P;P;P;P;P
Vest4		0.23
MVP		0.95
MPC		1.1
ClinPred		0.045	T
GERP RS		5.4
Varity_R		0.16
gMVP		0.46

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55728855; hg19: chr12-110221524;