rs55758736

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001715.3(BLK):​c.211G>A​(p.Ala71Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0114 in 1,613,932 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 156 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.014 ( 21 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.011 ( 135 hom. )

Consequence

BLK
NM_001715.3 missense

Scores

4
14

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts P:1B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.860

Publications

45 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BLK (HGNC:1057): (BLK proto-oncogene, Src family tyrosine kinase) This gene encodes a nonreceptor tyrosine-kinase of the src family of proto-oncogenes that are typically involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. The protein has a role in B-cell receptor signaling and B-cell development. The protein also stimulates insulin synthesis and secretion in response to glucose and enhances the expression of several pancreatic beta-cell transcription factors. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
BLK Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • maturity-onset diabetes of the young
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • systemic lupus erythematosus
    Inheritance: Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 11
    Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • monogenic diabetes
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.042304844).
BP6
Variant 8-11548067-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-11548067-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 12319.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0143 (2182/152200) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0234 (971/41520). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0222. There are 21 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 1055 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 2182 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
BLKNM_001715.3 linkc.211G>A p.Ala71Thr missense_variant Exon 4 of 13 ENST00000259089.9 NP_001706.2 P51451Q05D26

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BLKENST00000259089.9 linkc.211G>A p.Ala71Thr missense_variant Exon 4 of 13 1 NM_001715.3 ENSP00000259089.4 P51451
BLKENST00000533828.1 linkn.409G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 3 4
BLKENST00000645242.1 linkn.362G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 3 of 12
BLKENST00000696154.2 linkn.362G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 3 of 12 A0A8Q3SIE3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0143
AC:
2181
AN:
152082
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0234
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0138
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0386
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000770
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00477
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00142
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0380
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0177
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0116
AC:
2907
AN:
251454
AF XY:
0.0111
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0242
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00978
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0405
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0123
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0176
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0111
AC:
16258
AN:
1461732
Hom.:
135
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0112
AC XY:
8150
AN XY:
727172
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0266
AC:
889
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00984
AC:
440
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0393
AC:
1028
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000176
AC:
7
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00682
AC:
588
AN:
86246
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
126
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0494
AC:
282
AN:
5714
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0108
AC:
12046
AN:
1111952
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0141
AC:
852
AN:
60384
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.454
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
891
1783
2674
3566
4457
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
444
888
1332
1776
2220
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0143
AC:
2182
AN:
152200
Hom.:
21
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0142
AC XY:
1055
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0234
AC:
971
AN:
41520
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0137
AC:
210
AN:
15292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0386
AC:
134
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000772
AC:
4
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00436
AC:
21
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00142
AC:
15
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0408
AC:
12
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
776
AN:
68008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0175
AC:
37
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
106
213
319
426
532
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0134
Hom.:
70
Bravo
AF:
0.0156
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00890
AC:
33
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0119
AC:
46
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0216
AC:
95
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0121
AC:
104
ExAC
AF:
0.0117
AC:
1421
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00664
AC:
24
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0154
EpiControl
AF:
0.0162

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 11 Pathogenic:1Benign:4
Aug 25, 2009
OMIM
Significance:Pathogenic
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:literature only

- -

Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2024
Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 06, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Oct 05, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:5
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 23, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 25, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22696686, 20981092, 26821283, 23261300, 22995991, 25333069, 19667185, 23224494, 27884173, 31101814, 32028929) -

Aug 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BLK: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:2
Apr 06, 2023
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Mar 03, 2017
Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

ACMG Criteria:BP4 (6 predictors), PP3 (4 predictors), BS1 (2.5% in African 1.6% in European in 1000g), BS2 (about equal cases and controls in type2diabetesgenetics.org), PS3 (functional studies show effect) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.55
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.58
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.70
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.22
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.042
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.79
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.5
M
PhyloP100
0.86
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Uncertain
0.0050
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0060
D
Polyphen
0.56
P
Vest4
0.096
MPC
0.039
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
3.4
Varity_R
0.079
gMVP
0.34
Mutation Taster
=90/10
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55758736; hg19: chr8-11405576; COSMIC: COSV52050265; COSMIC: COSV52050265; API