Menu
GeneBe

rs55773834

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.2813C>A(p.Ala938Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000018 in 1,613,576 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A938T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

2
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:9B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.263
Variant links:
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.090875894).
BP6
Variant 13-32337168-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32337168-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51353.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=7}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BRCA2NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2813C>A p.Ala938Glu missense_variant 11/27 ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BRCA2ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2813C>A p.Ala938Glu missense_variant 11/275 NM_000059.4 A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152130
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000507
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000279
AC:
7
AN:
250824
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000295
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
135686
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000433
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00000547
AC:
8
AN:
1461446
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00000138
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
727014
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000239
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152130
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74318
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000507
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000992
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000166
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:9Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBreast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)Oct 29, 2003- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingSharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)Jan 04, 2008- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylNov 27, 2017- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMichigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of MichiganApr 21, 2016- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 23, 2023This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 09, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthDec 10, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonMar 23, 2023Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoMar 03, 2023The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.0004 (10/24886 chromosomes in the African/African American subpopulation, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is higher than would generally be expected for pathogenic variants in this gene. In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (Freitas et al. 2022. Mastology 32:e20220003), glioblastoma (PMID: 26689913 (2015)), and an advanced cancer (PMID: 28873162 (2017)). Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJul 26, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Identified in individuals with glioblastoma and breast cancer (Lu et al., 2015; Renata Mendes de Freitas et al., 2022); Also known as 3041C>A; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28873162, 23929434, 26689913, 28122867, de Freitas_2022, 32377563, 31911673, 26295337, 29884841, 31853058) -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 24, 2023Variant summary: BRCA2 c.2813C>A (p.Ala938Glu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.8e-05 in 250824 control chromosomes. Although the observed frequency does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic variant in this gene (0.00075), the variant may represent a rare ethnic-specific functional polymorphism as evidenced by it being found in 3 African American women over 70 years old who have never had cancer (FLOSSIES database). c.2813C>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer, including glioblastoma (example, Lu_2015, Mandelker_2017). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Nine submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments; five of them classified the variant as uncertain significance and four of them classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -
BRCA2-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 25, 2023The BRCA2 c.2813C>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Ala938Glu. This variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer, an individual with glioblastoma multiforme, and an individual with advanced cancer (Infante et al. 2013. PubMed ID: 23929434; Table S13, Lu et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26689913; eTable, Mandelker et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28873162). This variant occurs within a region of the BRCA2 gene that is predicted to be tolerant to variation (Table 2, Dines et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 31911673). This variant is reported in 0.040% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/chr13-32911305-C-A). It has conflicting interpretations of likely benign and uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/51353/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 24, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.30
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.34
Cadd
Benign
5.5
Dann
Benign
0.58
Eigen
Benign
-0.88
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.93
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.045
N
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.094
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.091
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.1
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.18
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.37
T;T
Vest4
0.28
MVP
0.83
MPC
0.028
ClinPred
0.042
T
GERP RS
-0.14
gMVP
0.33

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55773834; hg19: chr13-32911305; COSMIC: COSV66447667; COSMIC: COSV66447667; API