rs55788387
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001308093.3(GATA4):c.702G>A(p.Thr234=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00281 in 1,614,200 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0036 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0027 ( 18 hom. )
Consequence
GATA4
NM_001308093.3 synonymous
NM_001308093.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.39
Genes affected
GATA4 (HGNC:4173): (GATA binding protein 4) This gene encodes a member of the GATA family of zinc-finger transcription factors. Members of this family recognize the GATA motif which is present in the promoters of many genes. This protein is thought to regulate genes involved in embryogenesis and in myocardial differentiation and function, and is necessary for normal testicular development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with cardiac septal defects. Additionally, alterations in gene expression have been associated with several cancer types. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 8-11749001-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-11749001-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44335.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr8-11749001-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.39 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00358 (545/152322) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0042 (286/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0038. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 299 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 545 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GATA4 | NM_001308093.3 | c.702G>A | p.Thr234= | synonymous_variant | 3/7 | ENST00000532059.6 | NP_001295022.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GATA4 | ENST00000532059.6 | c.702G>A | p.Thr234= | synonymous_variant | 3/7 | 1 | NM_001308093.3 | ENSP00000435712 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00358 AC: 545AN: 152206Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
545
AN:
152206
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00348 AC: 876AN: 251486Hom.: 7 AF XY: 0.00347 AC XY: 471AN XY: 135920
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
876
AN:
251486
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
471
AN XY:
135920
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00273 AC: 3986AN: 1461878Hom.: 18 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00282 AC XY: 2051AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3986
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
2051
AN XY:
727240
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00358 AC: 545AN: 152322Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00401 AC XY: 299AN XY: 74476
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
545
AN:
152322
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
299
AN XY:
74476
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 02, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | GATA4: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 23, 2011 | Thr233Thr in exon 3 of GATA4: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. It has been identified in 6 individuals with congenital hear t defects and in 1 of 518 control chromosomes (Schluterman 2007, Reamon-Buettner 2007, Tomita-Mitchell 2007, Butler 2010). It has also been reported in dbSNP wi th a similar allele frequency (rs55788387, MAF=0.002). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Apr 09, 2018 | - - |
Atrioventricular septal defect 4 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at