Menu
GeneBe

rs55798001

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.3427G>A(p.Ala1143Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000144 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A1143V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00077 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000079 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense

Scores

12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0920
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0051268935).
BP6
Variant 13-102875769-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102875769-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134174.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Likely_benign=3, not_provided=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000775 (118/152310) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00274 (114/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00233. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 50 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ERCC5NM_000123.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3427G>A p.Ala1143Thr missense_variant 15/15 ENST00000652225.2
BIVM-ERCC5NM_001204425.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4789G>A p.Ala1597Thr missense_variant 23/23

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ERCC5ENST00000652225.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3427G>A p.Ala1143Thr missense_variant 15/15 NM_000123.4 P1P28715-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000775
AC:
118
AN:
152192
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000191
AC:
48
AN:
251248
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000177
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
135808
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00283
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000787
AC:
115
AN:
1461844
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000729
AC XY:
53
AN XY:
727240
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00278
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000775
AC:
118
AN:
152310
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000671
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00274
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000184
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000797
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00318
AC:
14
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000272
AC:
33
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
BIVM-ERCC5-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesApr 19, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeAug 05, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 24, 2022- -
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.066
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.67
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
Cadd
Benign
6.3
Dann
Benign
0.93
Eigen
Benign
-0.98
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.99
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.13
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.42
T;T;.;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0050
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0051
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.97
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
Polyphen
0.0040
.;.;.;B;.
Vest4
0.061, 0.064
MVP
0.22
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.0080
T
GERP RS
2.1
Varity_R
0.034
gMVP
0.076

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55798001; hg19: chr13-103528119; API