rs55806007

chr2-178531147-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):c.105468G>A(p.Pro35156=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00977 in 1,613,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 107 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0080 (6 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.010 (101 hom.)
• Consequence: TTN NM_001267550.2 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:24
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -2.19

Genes affected

TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

TTN-AS1 (HGNC:44124): (TTN antisense RNA 1) This gene encodes a non-coding RNA transcribed from the opposite strand to the titin gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
• BP6: Variant 2-178531147-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178531147-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47691.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178531147-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178531147-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.19 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00798 (1215/152238) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0106 (720/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00994. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 604 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 6 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TTN	NM_001267550.2	c.105468G>A	p.Pro35156=	synonymous_variant	358/363	ENST00000589042.5
TTN-AS1	NR_038272.1	n.220-4585C>T		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TTN	ENST00000589042.5	c.105468G>A	p.Pro35156=	synonymous_variant	358/363	5	NM_001267550.2	P1
TTN-AS1	ENST00000659121.1	n.416+7511C>T		intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00798 AC: 1214 AN: 152120 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00227

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00110

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00465

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.0193

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00787

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.0188

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0106

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.0115

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00891 AC: 2219 AN: 249148 Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00882 AC XY: 1192 AN XY: 135158

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00181

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00432

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.0164

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.0000556

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00585

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.0157

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0114

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.0119

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00995 AC: 14547 AN: 1461696 Hom.: 101 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00987 AC XY: 7180 AN XY: 727134

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00134

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00443

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.0161

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00694

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.0157

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0106

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00981

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00798 AC: 1215 AN: 152238 Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00811 AC XY: 604 AN XY: 74442

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00226

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00471

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.0193

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00788

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.0188

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0106

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.0114

Alfa AF: 0.0105 Hom.: 3

Bravo AF: 0.00680

Asia WGS AF: 0.00289 AC: 10 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.0110

EpiControl AF: 0.00966

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:24

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 09, 2019	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine	Apr 03, 2012	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Athena Diagnostics	Nov 08, 2019	- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Dec 21, 2012	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center	-	- -

not provided Benign:4

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen	-	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Mar 01, 2024	TTN: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories	Oct 19, 2023	- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -

Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -

Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -

Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome-Nilou Lab	Sep 10, 2021	- -

Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Feb 01, 2024

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

May 09, 2016

- -

Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Ambry Genetics

Jul 29, 2012

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.48
Cadd	Benign	0.0020
Dann	Benign	0.93

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55806007; hg19: chr2-179395874;