rs55857552

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_000748.3(CHRNB2):​c.1233G>A​(p.Ala411Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00526 in 1,534,416 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0032 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0055 ( 19 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNB2
NM_000748.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -5.66

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHRNB2 (HGNC:1962): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 2 subunit) Neuronal acetylcholine receptors are homo- or heteropentameric complexes composed of homologous alpha and beta subunits. They belong to a superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels which allow the flow of sodium and potassium across the plasma membrane in response to ligands such as acetylcholine and nicotine. This gene encodes one of several beta subunits. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CHRNB2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -17 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.73).
BP6
Variant 1-154572056-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-154572056-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 136770.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-5.66 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 481 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CHRNB2NM_000748.3 linkc.1233G>A p.Ala411Ala synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 6 ENST00000368476.4 NP_000739.1
CHRNB2XM_017000180.3 linkc.723G>A p.Ala241Ala synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 3 XP_016855669.1
CHRNB2XR_001736952.3 linkn.1500G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CHRNB2ENST00000368476.4 linkc.1233G>A p.Ala411Ala synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 6 1 NM_000748.3 ENSP00000357461.3
CHRNB2ENST00000637900.1 linkc.1239G>A p.Ala413Ala synonymous_variant Exon 5 of 6 5 ENSP00000490474.1
CHRNB2ENST00000636034.1 linkn.1233G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 5 of 9 5 ENSP00000489703.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00315
AC:
480
AN:
152214
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000892
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00110
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00318
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00550
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00621
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00295
AC:
378
AN:
128088
AF XY:
0.00287
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00164
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00102
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00517
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00427
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00549
AC:
7593
AN:
1382090
Hom.:
19
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00537
AC XY:
3659
AN XY:
681908
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000857
AC:
27
AN:
31512
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00292
AC:
104
AN:
35576
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00128
AC:
32
AN:
25064
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35668
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00126
AC:
100
AN:
79082
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00121
AC:
42
AN:
34656
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000573
AC:
3
AN:
5236
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00650
AC:
7008
AN:
1077562
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00480
AC:
277
AN:
57734
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.469
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
495
989
1484
1978
2473
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
284
568
852
1136
1420
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00316
AC:
481
AN:
152326
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00277
AC XY:
206
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000890
AC:
37
AN:
41580
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00261
AC:
40
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00144
AC:
5
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00145
AC:
7
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000282
AC:
3
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00342
AC:
1
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00550
AC:
374
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00614
AC:
13
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
25
50
76
101
126
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00294
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00328

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Dec 12, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Sep 16, 2024
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 18, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CHRNB2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy 3 Benign:2
Jul 21, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Jun 30, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

CHRNB2-related disorder Benign:1
Jul 10, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.73
CADD
Benign
0.16
DANN
Benign
0.69
PhyloP100
-5.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55857552; hg19: chr1-154544532; API