Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 22, 2016 | Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.5710C>G (p.Leu1904Val) variant causes a missense change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 4/4 in silico tools (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index) predict a benign outcome, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. The variant of interest was observed in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 5/120788 (1/24160), which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic BRCA2 variant of 1/1333. Multiple publications and databases cite the variant in affected individuals, in which multiple individuals carried another pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.3922G>T (p.Glu1308X), c.1813dup (p.Ile605AsnfsX11)) and BRCA1 (c.5324T>G (p.Met1775Arg - classified as pathogenic by LCA) and c.1949_1950delTA (p.Ile650LysfsX22)). In addition, multiple reputable clinical laboratories classify the variant as "likely benign/benign." Therefore, the variant of interest has been classified as Benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 20, 2021 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21990134, 24055113, 22848303, 15744044, 24323938, 25637381, 26689913, 17924331, 28814288, 32926152) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Leu1904Val variant was identified in 3 of 638 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with breast cancer and was not identified in 148 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Fackenthal 2005, Zhou 2005, Diez 2011). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs55875643) as "With Uncertain significance, other allele", ClinVar (classified as benign by ENIGMA, Counsyl, Invitae, Ambry Genetics, SCRP and one other clinical laboratory; as likely benign by GeneDx and four other clinical laboratories; and as uncertain significance by BIC), GeneInsight-COGR, MutDB, LOVD 3.0 (4x predicted neutral), UMD-LSDB (10x as likely neutral), BIC Database (8x with unknown significance), and ARUP Laboratories Database (not pathogenic or of no clinical significance). The variant was identified with the following co-occurring pathogenic variants: BRCA2 c.1813dup, p.Ile605Asnfs*11 (UMD database), BRCA1 c.1949_1950delTA, p.Ile650Lysfs*22 (Diez 2011), and BRCA2 c.7806-?_8632+?dup, p.Glu2878Glyfs*46 (our laboratory), increasing the likelihood that the p.Leu1904Val variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was not identified in Cosmic or the Zhejiang University database. The variant was identified in control databases in 14 of 276606 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00005 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 10 of 23996 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), Other in 1 of 6450 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), Latino in 1 of 34388 chromosomes (freq: 0.00003), and European in 2 of 126282 chromosomes (freq: 0.00002), while the variant was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Leu1904 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. The information in the literature is conflicting and limited to in silico models (Easton 2007, Lindor 2012, Guidugli 2014, Zhou 2005). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Feb 08, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jan 30, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 18, 2022 | - - |