rs55914168

Positions:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_Strong

The ENST00000357654.9(BRCA1):c.2351C>T(p.Ser784Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000049 in 1,613,816 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S784A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000049 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA1
ENST00000357654.9 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.17

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.24523443).

BP6

Variant 17-43093180-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43093180-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 37464.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43093180-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA1	NM_007294.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.2351C>T	p.Ser784Leu	missense_variant	10/23	ENST00000357654.9	NP_009225.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BRCA1	ENST00000357654.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.2351C>T	p.Ser784Leu	missense_variant	10/23	1	NM_007294.4	ENSP00000350283	P4	P38398-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152112

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000176

AC:

AN:

250640

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000140

AC XY:

AN XY:

135436

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000884

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000493

AC:

AN:

1461586

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000468

AC XY:

AN XY:

727078

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00114

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000171

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152230

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74420

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000869

ExAC

AF:

0.000165

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:11

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1

Uncertain:2Benign:2

Benign, reviewed by expert panel	curation	Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)	Jun 18, 2019	IARC class based on posterior probability from multifactorial likelihood analysis, thresholds for class as per Plon et al. 2008 (PMID: 18951446). Class 1 based on posterior probability = 0.000071 -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Counsyl	Dec 18, 2015	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP)	Aug 28, 2009	- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1)	May 29, 2002	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Apr 29, 2021	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Feb 22, 2016	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Apr 15, 2019	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital	Feb 06, 2024	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp	Aug 25, 2020	Variant summary: BRCA1 c.2351C>T (p.Ser784Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. These in silico predictions have not been verified with functional studies, with one study classifying the variant as benign, based on a homozygous occurrence in a patient derived LCL sample, and therefore using it as a control in the study (Loke_2015). The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00018 in 250640 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0012 within the Latino subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Latino control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (HBOC) phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Latino origin. The variant, c.2351C>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with tumors that belong to the HBOC spectrum, but without strong evidence for causality (e.g. Judkins_2005, McKean-Cowdin_2005, van der Hout_2006, Li_2018, Shao_2019, Abe_2019), moreover, in some of these studies, it was also found in healthy controls (McKean-Cowdin_2005, Li_2018). Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variants have been reported (BRCA1 c.942_956delinsCTTACTTC (p.Arg1315fsX24) and RB1 c.1411C>T (p.Gln471X), in two internal LCA samples), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. In addition, a recent multifactorial likelihood analysis predicted this variant to be Benign (Parsons_2019). Eight other submitters, including an expert panel (ENIGMA), have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant in ClinVar after 2014, and classified the variant as VUS (3x), likely benign (3x), or benign (2x; including the expert panel). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

not provided

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 18, 2020	This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 16683254, 16267036, 16518693, 12531920, 15726418, 15001988, 25782689, 25652403, 25348012, 15385441) -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	Jul 20, 2023	- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

The BRCA1 p.Ser784Leu variant was identified in 3 of 4154 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.0007) from individuals or families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and was present in 18 of 11,404 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.001) from healthy individuals (McKean-Cowdin 2005,van der Hout 2006, Li 2018, Fernandez-Lopez 2019). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs55914168) as â€šÃ„Ãºwith likely pathogenic, other alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, Color and 2 other submitters and uncertain significance by GeneDx, Counsyl and 3 other submitters), LOVD 3.0 (observed 15x), UMD-LSDB (observed 2x). The variant was identified in control databases in 45 of 282,304 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0002 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Latino in 43 of 33,396 chromosomes (freq: 0.001, increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant), African in 1 of 24,966 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004), European in 1 of 128,600 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008); it was not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Ser784 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 1 of 4 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -

BRCA1-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Jun 26, 2024

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Feb 01, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.19

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.018

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.16

CADD

Uncertain

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.66

D;.;.;.;T

Eigen

Uncertain

0.66

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.56

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.88

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.94

D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Pathogenic

0.41

MetaRNN

Benign

0.25

T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.74

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.1

M;M;.;.;.

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;N;N;N;N;N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.36

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-5.7

D;D;D;D;.

REVEL

Uncertain

0.63

Sift

Uncertain

0.0050

D;D;D;D;.

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.011

D;D;D;D;.

Polyphen

0.99

D;.;.;D;.

Vest4

0.55

MVP

0.96

MPC

0.43

ClinPred

0.53

GERP RS

5.4

Varity_R

0.35

gMVP

0.26

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over