rs559756386
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_003896.4(ST3GAL5):c.37C>T(p.Pro13Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00567 in 1,366,398 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 31 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003896.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00376 AC: 569AN: 151480Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00568 AC: 381AN: 67032Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00679 AC XY: 264AN XY: 38880
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00591 AC: 7183AN: 1214810Hom.: 30 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00625 AC XY: 3731AN XY: 596516
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00377 AC: 571AN: 151588Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00346 AC XY: 256AN XY: 74056
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
GM3 synthase deficiency Benign:3
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
not provided Benign:3
- -
- -
ST3GAL5: BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at