rs55986646
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.1644G>A(p.Gln548=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000502 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000048 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.426
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.66).
BP6
?
Variant 13-32333122-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32333122-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 51164.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32333122-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr13-32333122-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.426 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.1644G>A | p.Gln548= | synonymous_variant | 10/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.1644G>A | p.Gln548= | synonymous_variant | 10/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0000723 AC: 11AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000247 AC: 62AN: 251082Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000221 AC XY: 30AN XY: 135714
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
62
AN:
251082
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
135714
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000479 AC: 70AN: 1461724Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000440 AC XY: 32AN XY: 727152
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
70
AN:
1461724
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
727152
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0000722 AC: 11AN: 152322Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000940 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74486
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
11
AN:
152322
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74486
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2) | Sep 18, 2010 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 13, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Gln548Gln variant was identified in the literature in one Chinese family with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (Thirthagiri 2008); however, control chromosomes from healthy individuals were not evaluated in this study. The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs rs55986646) “With likely benign allele”, in the 1000 Genomes Project, in 1 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency 0.0002). It was also identified in the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database (January 13, 2015) in 28 of 121014 chromosomes (frequency: 0.0002) (or 28 individuals from a population of 8644 East Asian individuals (frequency: 0.003)), and not from European (Non-Finnish)/African/Latino/South Asian/European (Finnish) or other individuals; the Clinvitae database classified the variant as benign/likely benign; ClinVar (4X, classified as a benign by BIC and GeneDX; likely benign by Ambry Genetics), and UMD (2X as a 3-unclassified variant variant, co-occurring with a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (c.1212delT (p.Asn404LysfsX26), increasing the likelihood that the p.Gln548Gln variant does not have clinical significance). The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 3 individuals with breast, and ovarian cancer including one with a co-occurring pathogenic variant (BRCA2 c.246delA), increasing the likelihood the p.Gln548Gln variant does not have clinical significance. The p.Gln548Gln variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. However, four out of five in-silico splicing tools predict abolishment of a 3’ splice site in a region not expected to be involved in splicing, but this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, this variant meets our laboratories criteria to be classified as benign. - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/) and frequency 0.0032 (East Asian), derived from ExAC (2014-12-17). - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jan 14, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Nov 30, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 10, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 02, 2019 | Variant summary: BRCA2 c.1644G>A alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 274202 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0034 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA2 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (0.00075), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.1644G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals with personal and/or family history of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (Hwang_2017, Trujillano_2015, Thirthagiri_2008, Suter_2004). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with a pathogenic variant have been reported (BRCA2 c.1212delT, p.Asn404Lysfs*26; UMD), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four ClinVar submitters including an expert panel (ENIGMA) (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 02, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at