rs56001030

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_002473.6(MYH9):​c.1083C>T​(p.Asp361=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00448 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0042 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 36 hom. )

Consequence

MYH9
NM_002473.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.54
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH9 (HGNC:7579): (myosin heavy chain 9) This gene encodes a conventional non-muscle myosin; this protein should not be confused with the unconventional myosin-9a or 9b (MYO9A or MYO9B). The encoded protein is a myosin IIA heavy chain that contains an IQ domain and a myosin head-like domain which is involved in several important functions, including cytokinesis, cell motility and maintenance of cell shape. Defects in this gene have been associated with non-syndromic sensorineural deafness autosomal dominant type 17, Epstein syndrome, Alport syndrome with macrothrombocytopenia, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome and macrothrombocytopenia with progressive sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 22-36319565-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-36319565-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44548.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-36319565-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.55 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00422 (642/152266) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0116 (178/15292). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0102. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 309 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 642 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYH9NM_002473.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1083C>T p.Asp361= synonymous_variant 10/41 ENST00000216181.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYH9ENST00000216181.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.1083C>T p.Asp361= synonymous_variant 10/411 NM_002473.6 P1P35579-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00422
AC:
642
AN:
152148
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000918
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0117
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00412
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00717
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00464
AC:
1166
AN:
251438
Hom.:
12
AF XY:
0.00438
AC XY:
595
AN XY:
135904
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000923
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00928
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0266
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00443
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00505
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00450
AC:
6585
AN:
1461872
Hom.:
36
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00447
AC XY:
3250
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000807
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00912
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0267
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000730
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00455
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00566
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00422
AC:
642
AN:
152266
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00415
AC XY:
309
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000915
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0116
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0317
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00412
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00710
Alfa
AF:
0.00566
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00534
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00632
EpiControl
AF:
0.00522

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 02, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 30, 2012Asp361Asp in Exon 10 of MYH9: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.7% (48/7020) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs56001030). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 11, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 20, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsMay 24, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 22, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2024MYH9: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesAug 24, 2023- -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 17 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenNov 11, 2021- -
MYH9-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
13
DANN
Benign
0.86
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56001030; hg19: chr22-36715610; COSMIC: COSV53384826; COSMIC: COSV53384826; API