rs56014374

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004612.4(TGFBR1):​c.457G>A​(p.Val153Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00192 in 1,614,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

TGFBR1
NM_004612.4 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.71
Variant links:
Genes affected
TGFBR1 (HGNC:11772): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 1) The protein encoded by this gene forms a heteromeric complex with type II TGF-beta receptors when bound to TGF-beta, transducing the TGF-beta signal from the cell surface to the cytoplasm. The encoded protein is a serine/threonine protein kinase. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Loeys-Dietz aortic aneurysm syndrome (LDAS). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in the TGFBR1 gene, where missense mutations are typically associated with disease (based on misZ statistic). The gene has 48 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 16 curated benign missense variants. Gene score misZ: 2.7935 (below the threshold of 3.09). Trascript score misZ: 3.6468 (above the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, multiple self-healing squamous epithelioma, Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013447493).
BP6
Variant 9-99132622-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-99132622-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 213868.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-99132622-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00114 (174/152296) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0021 (143/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00182. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 91 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 174 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TGFBR1NM_004612.4 linkc.457G>A p.Val153Ile missense_variant Exon 3 of 9 ENST00000374994.9 NP_004603.1 P36897-1Q5T7S2B4DXN7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TGFBR1ENST00000374994.9 linkc.457G>A p.Val153Ile missense_variant Exon 3 of 9 1 NM_004612.4 ENSP00000364133.4 P36897-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00114
AC:
174
AN:
152180
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000338
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00103
AC:
259
AN:
251094
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000958
AC XY:
130
AN XY:
135676
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000550
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000878
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00201
AC:
2933
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00190
AC XY:
1384
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000239
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000648
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000487
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00241
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00177
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00114
AC:
174
AN:
152296
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00122
AC XY:
91
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000337
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00210
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00553
Hom.:
16
Bravo
AF:
0.00127
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00270
AC:
10
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00186
AC:
16
ExAC
AF:
0.00110
AC:
134
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00240
EpiControl
AF:
0.00207

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:6
Mar 16, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 02, 2017
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2016
Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 25, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided Benign:6
-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 25, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25715477, 28655553, 34032567, 30809044) -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 25, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TGFBR1: BP4, BS1 -

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1 Benign:2
Feb 01, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Loeys-Dietz syndrome Benign:2
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 23, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Multiple self-healing squamous epithelioma;C4551955:Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1 Benign:1
-
Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TGFBR1 NM_004612.3 exon 3 p.Val153Ile (c.457G>A): This variant has been reported in the literature in one individual with vascular anomalies (Mattassi 2018 PMID:28655553). However, this variant is present in 0.1% (129/64576) of European alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/9-99132622-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r3) and is present in ClinVar, with several labs classifying this variant as benign or likely benign (Variation ID:213868). Evolutionary conservation and computational predictive tools suggest that this variant may not impact the protein. In summary, data on this variant suggests that this variant does not cause disease, but requires further evidence. Therefore this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Jun 27, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.066
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.43
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.40
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.012
T;T;T;.;.;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.025
Eigen_PC
Benign
0.19
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.90
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.0083
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.92
.;.;L;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.37
N;N;N;N;N;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.091
Sift
Benign
0.36
T;T;T;T;T;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.92
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0010, 0.095
.;.;B;.;B;.;.
Vest4
0.26, 0.17, 0.23
MVP
0.52
MPC
0.41
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
5.1
Varity_R
0.058
gMVP
0.29

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56014374; hg19: chr9-101894904; API