rs56061641
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.99991T>Cā(p.Cys33331Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000213 in 1,613,332 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.99991T>C | p.Cys33331Arg | missense_variant | Exon 356 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.99991T>C | p.Cys33331Arg | missense_variant | Exon 356 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000296 AC: 45AN: 152086Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000271 AC: 67AN: 247674 AF XY: 0.000298 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000203 AC: 296AN: 1461128Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000213 AC XY: 155AN XY: 726830 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152204Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000322 AC XY: 24AN XY: 74422 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3Benign:5
The TTN c.99991T>C; p.Cys33331Arg variant (rs56061641; ClinVar Variation ID: 47622) is rare in the general population (<0.2% allele frequency in the Genome Aggregation Database) and has not been reported in the medical literature in association with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or other TTN-related disease. The clinical relevance of rare missense variants in this gene, which are identified on average once per individual sequenced in affected populations (Herman 2012), is not well understood. Yet, evidence suggests that the vast majority of such missense variants do not contribute to the clinical outcome of DCM (Begay 2015). Thus, the clinical significance of the p.Cys33331Arg variant cannot be determined with certainty. References: Begay RL et al. Role of Titin Missense Variants in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Nov 13;4(11). PMID: 26567375. Herman DS et al. Truncations of titin causing dilated cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 16;366(7):619-28. PMID: 22335739. Linke WA and Hamdani N. Gigantic business: titin properties and function through thick and thin. Circ Res 2014; 114(6): 1052-1068. PMID: 24625729. -
- -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28771489, 24503780, 24781210) -
- -
- -
- -
TTN: BS2 -
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:4
- -
- -
Variant summary: TTN c.92287T>C (p.Cys30763Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00027 in 247674 control chromosomes. This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in TTN causing Autosomal Recessive Titinopathy (0.00027 vs 0.00039), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.92287T>C has been observed in an individual with dilated cardiomyopathy (example: Pugh_2014) and in an individual who died from a sudden unexplained cardiac death (example: Campuzano_2015); however, neither of these instances were associated with strong evidence of causality. The variant was also observed in a child with myopathy who was found to carry a variant in a different gene that was considered causative for their phenotype (example: Estan_2019). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with TTN-related disorders. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 24503780, 26516846, 30770808). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 47622). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Cys30736Arg in exon 305 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 3.1% (6/192) of Luhya chromosomes b y the 1000 Genomes Project (dbSNP rs56061641). -
- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
See cases Benign:1
This variant was classified as: Likely benign. The following ACMG criteria were applied in classifying this variant: BP1,BP6. -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at