rs56128296
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.1137T>G(p.Ile379Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000278 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I379F) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | NM_007294.4 | c.1137T>G | p.Ile379Met | missense_variant | 10/23 | ENST00000357654.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA1 | ENST00000357654.9 | c.1137T>G | p.Ile379Met | missense_variant | 10/23 | 1 | NM_007294.4 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00146 AC: 222AN: 152196Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000414 AC: 104AN: 251152Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 44AN XY: 135738
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000155 AC: 227AN: 1461848Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000138 AC XY: 100AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00146 AC: 222AN: 152314Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 112AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Pathway Genomics | Oct 30, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Michigan Medical Genetics Laboratories, University of Michigan | Nov 03, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Jan 21, 2014 | - - |
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Aug 02, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jan 01, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 28, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Apr 27, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 09, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 18, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jul 02, 2020 | - - |
not specified Benign:3Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 24, 2019 | - - |
not provided, no classification provided | reference population | ITMI | Sep 19, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 24, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 07, 2014 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Nov 15, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Feb 14, 2014 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Mar 03, 2023 | - - |
Familial cancer of breast;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1;C3280442:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 4;C4554406:Fanconi anemia, complementation group S Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Mar 10, 2022 | - - |
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The p.Ile379Met variant was identified in 3 of 634 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.005) from individuals or families with Breast cancer and was present in 2 of 192 control chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from healthy individuals (Fackenthal, 2005; McKean-Cowdin, 2005). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56128296) “With other allele”, with a minor allele frequency of 0.002 (1000 Genomes Project), NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (Exome Variant Server), HGMD, LOVD, ClinVar database (with conflicting data from submitters including BIC (Benign), Counsyl (likely Benign), Invitae and ITMI (not provided), and UMD (10X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.815_824dup (p.Thr276AlafsX14)), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ile379Met variant does not have clinical significance. In the exome Variant Server project the variant was identified in 28 of 4406 African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin. Studies suggest this variant is common in African populations and does not have an effect on protein function (McKean-Cowdin, 2005). The p.Ile379 residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. Functional assays performed by Millot (2012) indicate no reduction in expression when this variant is present. Abkevich (2004) report this variant as having a Grantham score of 10 suggesting little to no effect on the protein. In summary, based on the above information,this variant is classified as benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Baylor Genetics | Feb 23, 2017 | - - |
BRCA1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 30, 2020 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at