rs561414163

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):​c.3395A>G​(p.Gln1132Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00439 in 657,008 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 91 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 5 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0052 ( 86 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.214
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0036060512).
BP6
Variant 16-53622256-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53622256-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 167606.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00153 (226/148064) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0474 (220/4642). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0423. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 173 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RPGRIP1LNM_015272.5 linkc.3395A>G p.Gln1132Arg missense_variant Exon 23 of 27 ENST00000647211.2 NP_056087.2 Q68CZ1-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1LENST00000647211.2 linkc.3395A>G p.Gln1132Arg missense_variant Exon 23 of 27 NM_015272.5 ENSP00000493946.1 Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00152
AC:
225
AN:
147946
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000612
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0471
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000149
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000982
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00769
AC:
821
AN:
106826
Hom.:
24
AF XY:
0.0108
AC XY:
638
AN XY:
58998
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000200
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000980
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0432
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000254
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00154
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00522
AC:
2659
AN:
508944
Hom.:
86
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00775
AC XY:
2125
AN XY:
274366
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000144
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000645
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000332
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0456
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000406
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00168
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00153
AC:
226
AN:
148064
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00240
AC XY:
173
AN XY:
72222
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000613
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.0474
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000149
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000971
Alfa
AF:
0.000471
Hom.:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0227
AC:
323
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0150
AC:
51
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Oct 06, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 12, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Jan 16, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Kidney disorder Benign:1
Mar 01, 2018
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 7 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 5 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 5;C1969053:Joubert syndrome 7;C5436841:COACH syndrome 3 Benign:1
Jul 13, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nephronophthisis 8 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.68
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
6.3
DANN
Benign
0.13
Eigen
Benign
-1.3
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0026
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
.;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0036
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.6
L;L;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.50
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.30
.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.012
Sift
Benign
0.52
.;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.42
.;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;B;.
Vest4
0.16, 0.086
MutPred
0.27
Loss of sheet (P = 0.0315);Loss of sheet (P = 0.0315);.;
MPC
0.077
ClinPred
0.014
T
GERP RS
0.16
Varity_R
0.079
gMVP
0.097

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs561414163; hg19: chr16-53656168; API