rs56142348
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000744.7(CHRNA4):āc.1203G>Cā(p.Leu401=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00046 in 1,603,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00060 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00045 ( 5 hom. )
Consequence
CHRNA4
NM_000744.7 synonymous
NM_000744.7 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.11
Genes affected
CHRNA4 (HGNC:1958): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic alpha 4 subunit) This gene encodes a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, which belongs to a superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels that play a role in fast signal transmission at synapses. These pentameric receptors can bind acetylcholine, which causes an extensive change in conformation that leads to the opening of an ion-conducting channel across the plasma membrane. This protein is an integral membrane receptor subunit that can interact with either nAChR beta-2 or nAChR beta-4 to form a functional receptor. Mutations in this gene cause nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy type 1. Polymorphisms in this gene that provide protection against nicotine addiction have been described. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 20-63350208-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-63350208-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 136758.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.11 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000605 (92/152184) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000147 (10/68024). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000791. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 41 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 92 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA4 | NM_000744.7 | c.1203G>C | p.Leu401= | synonymous_variant | 5/6 | ENST00000370263.9 | NP_000735.1 | |
CHRNA4 | NM_001256573.2 | c.675G>C | p.Leu225= | synonymous_variant | 5/6 | NP_001243502.1 | ||
CHRNA4 | NR_046317.2 | n.1412G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNA4 | ENST00000370263.9 | c.1203G>C | p.Leu401= | synonymous_variant | 5/6 | 1 | NM_000744.7 | ENSP00000359285 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000605 AC: 92AN: 152184Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000901 AC: 207AN: 229768Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.000797 AC XY: 100AN XY: 125426
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
207
AN:
229768
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
100
AN XY:
125426
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000445 AC: 646AN: 1451216Hom.: 5 Cov.: 98 AF XY: 0.000449 AC XY: 324AN XY: 720922
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
646
AN:
1451216
Hom.:
Cov.:
98
AF XY:
AC XY:
324
AN XY:
720922
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000605 AC: 92AN: 152184Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000552 AC XY: 41AN XY: 74338
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
92
AN:
152184
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
74338
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jul 03, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 27, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Feb 09, 2015 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
CHRNA4-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 04, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 16, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at