rs56147819
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_017433.5(MYO3A):c.2133G>A(p.Leu711Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000599 in 1,613,158 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00099 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00056 ( 8 hom. )
Consequence
MYO3A
NM_017433.5 synonymous
NM_017433.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 2.34
Genes affected
MYO3A (HGNC:7601): (myosin IIIA) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the myosin superfamily. Myosins are actin-dependent motor proteins and are categorized into conventional myosins (class II) and unconventional myosins (classes I and III through XV) based on their variable C-terminal cargo-binding domains. Class III myosins, such as this one, have a kinase domain N-terminal to the conserved N-terminal motor domains and are expressed in photoreceptors. The protein encoded by this gene plays an important role in hearing in humans. Three different recessive, loss of function mutations in the encoded protein have been shown to cause nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Expression of this gene is highly restricted, with the strongest expression in retina and cochlea. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.37).
BP6
Variant 10-26128409-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-26128409-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 164619.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=4}. Variant chr10-26128409-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.34 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000985 (150/152272) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00636 (33/5188). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00514. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 77 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 8 SD gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO3A | NM_017433.5 | c.2133G>A | p.Leu711Leu | synonymous_variant | 20/35 | ENST00000642920.2 | NP_059129.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO3A | ENST00000642920.2 | c.2133G>A | p.Leu711Leu | synonymous_variant | 20/35 | NM_017433.5 | ENSP00000495965.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000986 AC: 150AN: 152154Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
150
AN:
152154
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00159 AC: 400AN: 250980Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 203AN XY: 135640
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
400
AN:
250980
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
203
AN XY:
135640
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000559 AC: 816AN: 1460886Hom.: 8 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000578 AC XY: 420AN XY: 726810
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
816
AN:
1460886
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
420
AN XY:
726810
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000985 AC: 150AN: 152272Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00103 AC XY: 77AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
150
AN:
152272
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Oct 17, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Dec 21, 2015 | Leu711Leu in Exon 20 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.65% (75/11534) of L atino chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadi nstitute.org; dbSNP rs56147819). - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 16, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 02, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at