rs56158747
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4682C>T(p.Thr1561Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000233 in 1,614,076 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA1
NM_007294.4 missense
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
2
7
10
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.69
Genes affected
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04269412).
BP6
Variant 17-43071232-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43071232-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 55259.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-43071232-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00134 AC: 204AN: 152204Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
204
AN:
152204
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000304 AC: 76AN: 250362Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000221 AC XY: 30AN XY: 135486
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
76
AN:
250362
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
135486
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000116 AC: 170AN: 1461754Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000106 AC XY: 77AN XY: 727204
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
170
AN:
1461754
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
77
AN XY:
727204
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00135 AC: 206AN: 152322Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00134 AC XY: 100AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
206
AN:
152322
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
100
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
24
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
AC:
47
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:21
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 30, 2018 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15350310, 24055113, 25637381, 22505045, 8776600, 10811118, 26689913, 27153395, 26332594, 28781887, 16267036, 15726418, 17308087, 22811390, 30765603, 33087888) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 19, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 03, 2016 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Counsyl | Apr 26, 2014 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA1) | May 29, 2002 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sharing Clinical Reports Project (SCRP) | Aug 08, 2008 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Dec 08, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 02, 2020 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 24, 2014 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 16, 2014 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 04, 2025 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Feb 14, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Genetics Program, Instituto Nacional de Cancer | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 11, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 26, 2021 | - - |
BRCA1-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Sep 23, 2024 | - - |
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | research | CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington | Jun 01, 2014 | - - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA1 p.Thr1561Ile variant was identified in 3 of 806 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from individuals with breast or ovarian cancer and was absent in 432 control chromosomes from these studies (Durocher 1996, McKean-Cowdin 2005). The variant was also identified in at least 20 other patients from a data set 55630 patients undergoing clinical BRCA1 mutation screening (Judkins 2005). The p.Thr1561Ile variant was identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (26X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (4X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was listed once as co-occurring with a known pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 (c.-200_80del (p.Met1SerfsX13)), and Judkins (2005) identified the variant in trans with a different pathogenic BRCA1 mutation (p.Cys64Tyr), increasing the likelihood that the p.Thr1561Ile variant does not have clinical importance. The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs56158747) with a minor allele frequency of 0.002 (1000 Genomes Project), and in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project with a frequency of 0.005 in African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign polymorphism in certain populations of origin. This residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Two functional studies using a yeast transcription activation assay found that the variant displayed wild-type activity (Carvalho 2007, Hayes 2000). In addition, Durocher (1996) found this variant in the germline but absent in a breast tumour from a patient, suggesting a benign effect of the variant on protein function. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetics and Molecular Pathology, SA Pathology | Aug 11, 2020 | The BRCA1 c.4682C>T variant is classified as Likely Benign (BS2, BP6) - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
.;T;.;.;T;.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
.;L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
D;N;.;D;.;N;D;D;N;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Uncertain
D;D;.;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;.;.;D
Polyphen
0.94, 0.96
.;P;.;.;.;.;.;.;D;.
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at