rs56158747
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4682C>T(p.Thr1561Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000233 in 1,614,076 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_007294.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00134 AC: 204AN: 152204Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000304 AC: 76AN: 250362Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000221 AC XY: 30AN XY: 135486
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000116 AC: 170AN: 1461754Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000106 AC XY: 77AN XY: 727204
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00135 AC: 206AN: 152322Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00134 AC XY: 100AN XY: 74502
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
- -
- -
- -
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15350310, 24055113, 25637381, 22505045, 8776600, 10811118, 26689913, 27153395, 26332594, 28781887, 16267036, 15726418, 17308087, 22811390, 30765603, 33087888) -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:4
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
- -
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:4
- -
- -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
- -
- -
BRCA1-related cancer predisposition Benign:1
- -
Breast neoplasm Benign:1
- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
The BRCA1 p.Thr1561Ile variant was identified in 3 of 806 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.004) from individuals with breast or ovarian cancer and was absent in 432 control chromosomes from these studies (Durocher 1996, McKean-Cowdin 2005). The variant was also identified in at least 20 other patients from a data set 55630 patients undergoing clinical BRCA1 mutation screening (Judkins 2005). The p.Thr1561Ile variant was identified in HGMD, LOVD, the BIC database (26X with unknown clinical importance), and UMD (4X as a neutral variant). In UMD the variant was listed once as co-occurring with a known pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 (c.-200_80del (p.Met1SerfsX13)), and Judkins (2005) identified the variant in trans with a different pathogenic BRCA1 mutation (p.Cys64Tyr), increasing the likelihood that the p.Thr1561Ile variant does not have clinical importance. The variant was listed in dbSNP (ID: rs56158747) with a minor allele frequency of 0.002 (1000 Genomes Project), and in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project with a frequency of 0.005 in African American alleles, increasing the likelihood that this is a low frequency benign polymorphism in certain populations of origin. This residue is not conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. Two functional studies using a yeast transcription activation assay found that the variant displayed wild-type activity (Carvalho 2007, Hayes 2000). In addition, Durocher (1996) found this variant in the germline but absent in a breast tumour from a patient, suggesting a benign effect of the variant on protein function. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as predicted benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
The BRCA1 c.4682C>T variant is classified as Likely Benign (BS2, BP6) -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at