rs56170584

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.

The NM_000251.3(MSH2):​c.14C>A​(p.Pro5Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000282 in 1,598,272 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000028 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MSH2
NM_000251.3 missense

Scores

5
12
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.99
Variant links:
Genes affected
MSH2 (HGNC:7325): (mutS homolog 2) This locus is frequently mutated in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC). When cloned, it was discovered to be a human homolog of the E. coli mismatch repair gene mutS, consistent with the characteristic alterations in microsatellite sequences (RER+ phenotype) found in HNPCC. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
MSH2NM_000251.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.14C>A p.Pro5Gln missense_variant 1/16 ENST00000233146.7 NP_000242.1 P43246-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MSH2ENST00000233146.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.14C>A p.Pro5Gln missense_variant 1/161 NM_000251.3 ENSP00000233146.2 P43246-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000770
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000318
AC:
7
AN:
220468
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000250
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
120124
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000284
AC:
41
AN:
1445928
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000306
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
717926
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000997
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000334
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152344
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000771
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000478
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000642
ExAC
AF:
0.0000249
AC:
3
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Lynch syndrome 1 Uncertain:3Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Nov 14, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 27363726]. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylDec 10, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsSep 26, 2022- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 05, 2023This missense variant replaces proline with glutamine at codon 5 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). An RNA study reported no splicing defect detected in carrier RNA (PMID: 16425354; InSiGHT database). However, a functional study reported that this variant showed RNA expression defect in transfected cell lines (PMID: 28494185). This variant has intermediate MSH2 function in a 6-thioguanine sensitivity assay in haploid human cells (internally defined LOF score threshold -1.32 < LOF score < 0.88, PMID: 33357406). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with colorectal, endometrial and gastric cancer (PMID: 14514376, 23760103, 26845104, 29050249, 31054147, 31307542, 33294277, 33309985), breast and ovarian cancer (PMID: 28580595, 30982232, 32019277, 32068069), pancreatic cancer (PMID: 32980694), and cancer unaffected controls (PMID: 32980694, 33309985). This variant has been identified in 8/251846 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 22, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 25, 2021- -
Lynch syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MSH2 p.Pro5Gln variant was identified in 2 of 3138 proband chromosomes (freq: 0.001) from individuals with gastric cancer and was present in 3 of 4098 control chromosomes (freq: 0.001) from healthy Japanese individuals (Shirts 2016, Kim 2017, Yamaguchi-Kabata 2018). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (rs56170584) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Counsyl and three other submitters). The variant was not identified in the UMD LSDB database. The variant was identified in control databases in 7 of 214510 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the East Asian population in 7 of 15668 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004) while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish or South Asian populations. The p.Pro5Gln residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and 4 of 5 computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. This variant was identidied in one individual with gastric cancer and first-degree relatives with melanoma and breast cancer, although the proband demonstrated normal IHC and MMR levels (Kim 2017). One study showed greatly reduced mRNA and protein levels for this variant, possibly due to a predicted circular loop RNA structure (Arora 2017). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthDec 13, 2023This missense variant replaces proline with glutamine at codon 5 of the MSH2 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may have deleterious impact on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold >= 0.7, PMID: 27666373). An RNA study reported no splicing defect detected in carrier RNA (PMID: 16425354; InSiGHT database). However, a functional study reported that this variant showed RNA expression defect in transfected cell lines (PMID: 28494185). This variant has intermediate MSH2 function in a 6-thioguanine sensitivity assay in haploid human cells (internally defined LOF score threshold -1.32 < LOF score < 0.88, PMID: 33357406). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with colorectal, endometrial and gastric cancer (PMID: 14514376, 23760103, 26845104, 29050249, 31054147, 31307542, 33294277, 33309985), breast and ovarian cancer (PMID: 28580595, 30982232, 32019277, 32068069), pancreatic cancer (PMID: 32980694), and cancer unaffected controls (PMID: 32980694, 33309985). This variant has been identified in 8/251846 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoDec 28, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 06, 2023In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with MSH2-related cancers; tumor IHC analyses did not consistently show loss of MSH2 protein (Sun et al., 2004; Chao et al., 2019; Tian et al., 2019); Published functional studies are conflicting: showed defective RNA and protein expression as well as cell viability and response to DNA-damaging agents in one study (Arora et al., 2017) and normal mismatch repair function and cell growth rates in another (Jia et al., 2020); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 14514376, 29192238, 15046089, 16425354, 18383312, 26333163, 26845104, 28580595, 29050249, 28706299, 31386297, 32255556, 32566746, 30798936, 35538921, 31569399, 18822302, 21120944, 30982232, 33357406, 33471991, 33309985, 32019277, 23760103, 31307542, 35057767, 33294277, 30374176, 31054147, 28494185) -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 29, 2023Variant summary: MSH2 c.14C>A (p.Pro5Gln) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 3.2e-05 in 220468 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance.c.14C>A has been reported in the literature as a VUS in settings of multigene panel testing of individuals affected with a variety of cancers such as stomach/gastric, breast, Lynch tumors (example, Wang_2005, Shirts_2015, Kim_2017, Xie_2018, Chao_2019, Kiyozumi_2019, Tian_2019, Tsai_2019, Wang_2019, Kim_2022). Some of these reports included individuals with conflicting immunohistochemistry (IHC) findings such as normal IHC (example, Shirts_2015), stable MSI and normal IHC (example, Chao_2019) and at-least one report of an individual with colorectal cancer and negative staining for MSH2 but positive staining for MLH1, MSH6 and PMS2 (example, Tian_2019). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (MSH6 c.3261dupC, p.Phe1088fs, Kim_2022), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, indicating that cells expressing the variant had nondetectable levels of MSH2 RNA and protein expression and impaired DNA-damage response in-vitro (Arora_2017). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 26845104, 16425354, 28494185, 29050249, 28580595, 30374176, 30982232, 31307542, 31386297, 31054147, 35884469). Twelve submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified as likely benign (n=5) and VUS (n=7). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The MSH2 p.Pro5Gln variant was identified in 2 of 3138 proband chromosomes (freq: 0.001) from individuals with gastric cancer and was present in 3 of 4098 control chromosomes (freq: 0.001) from healthy Japanese individuals (Shirts 2016, Kim 2017, Yamaguchi-Kabata 2018). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (rs56170584) as “With Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (classified as uncertain significance by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, GeneDx, Counsyl and three other submitters). The variant was not identified in the UMD LSDB database. The variant was identified in control databases in 7 of 214510 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the East Asian population in 7 of 15668 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004) while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, Finnish or South Asian populations. The p.Pro5Gln residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms and 4 of 5 computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. This variant was identidied in one individual with gastric cancer and first-degree relatives with melanoma and breast cancer, although the proband demonstrated normal IHC and MMR levels (Kim 2017). One study showed greatly reduced mRNA and protein levels for this variant, possibly due to a predicted circular loop RNA structure (Arora 2017). In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer ResearchMay 01, 2019- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingUniversity of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of WashingtonJan 27, 2023Internal laboratory data reveals that this variant has been detected in several individuals whose personal histories, family histories, or tumor profiles were not consistent with Lynch syndrome (internal data, unpublished). -
Ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -
Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal neoplasms Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 28, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.44
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.21
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.39
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.75
D;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.57
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.62
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.63
D
MetaRNN
Uncertain
0.64
D;D;D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.62
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
D;.;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.83
Sift
Uncertain
0.0010
D;.;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D;.;T
Polyphen
0.91
P;.;D
Vest4
0.80
MutPred
0.68
Loss of ubiquitination at K6 (P = 0.0547);Loss of ubiquitination at K6 (P = 0.0547);Loss of ubiquitination at K6 (P = 0.0547);
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.032
ClinPred
0.77
D
GERP RS
5.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.7
Varity_R
0.74
gMVP
0.48

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56170584; hg19: chr2-47630344; API