rs56199702

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP6BS1BS2

The NM_000165.5(GJA1):c.-16-12T>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0063 in 1,546,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 67 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0056 ( 8 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0064 ( 59 hom. )

Consequence

GJA1
NM_000165.5 intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.9992

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.57

Variant links:

Genes affected

GJA1 (HGNC:4274): (gap junction protein alpha 1) This gene is a member of the connexin gene family. The encoded protein is a component of gap junctions, which are composed of arrays of intercellular channels that provide a route for the diffusion of low molecular weight materials from cell to cell. The encoded protein is the major protein of gap junctions in the heart that are thought to have a crucial role in the synchronized contraction of the heart and in embryonic development. A related intronless pseudogene has been mapped to chromosome 5. Mutations in this gene have been associated with oculodentodigital dysplasia, autosomal recessive craniometaphyseal dysplasia and heart malformations. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

GJA1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP6

Variant 6-121446820-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-121446820-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 355158.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=3, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr6-121446820-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00558 (850/152306) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0094 (639/67996). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00879. There are 8 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 398 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 8 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GJA1	NM_000165.5 link	c.-16-12T>A		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	ENST00000282561.4	NP_000156.1	P17302A0A654IBU3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GJA1	ENST00000282561.4 link	c.-16-12T>A	intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	1	NM_000165.5	ENSP00000282561.3	P17302
GJA1	ENST00000647564.1 link	c.-16-12T>A	intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1			ENSP00000497565.1	P17302
GJA1	ENST00000649003.1 link	c.-16-12T>A	intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1			ENSP00000497283.1	P17302
GJA1	ENST00000650427.1 link	c.-16-12T>A	intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1			ENSP00000497367.1	P17302

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00559

AC:

850

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00960

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00940

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00670

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00573

AC:

1433

AN:

250014

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00571

AC XY:

773

AN XY:

135340

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00112

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00234

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00258

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0108

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00911

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00687

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00638

AC:

8894

AN:

1393862

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00638

AC XY:

4451

AN XY:

697682

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00280

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00214

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000130

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0111

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00738

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00556

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00558

AC:

850

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00534

AC XY:

398

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00130

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00196

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00231

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000621

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00960

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00940

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00663

Alfa

AF:

0.00917

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00429

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

GJA1: BS2 -

Jan 24, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 28, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome 1

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Oculodentodigital dysplasia

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Syndactyly type 3

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.76

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.76

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Pathogenic

1.0

dbscSNV1_RF

Pathogenic

0.91

SpliceAI score (max)

0.99

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

DS_AG_spliceai

0.99

Position offset: 2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over