rs56216404
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BA1
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The filtering allele frequency of the c.1383A>G (p.Gln461=) variant in the BRAF gene is 0.986% (120/10404) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA135073/MONDO:0021060/004
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0037 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00044 ( 6 hom. )
Consequence
BRAF
NM_001374258.1 synonymous
NM_001374258.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.109
Genes affected
BRAF (HGNC:1097): (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase) This gene encodes a protein belonging to the RAF family of serine/threonine protein kinases. This protein plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERK signaling pathway, which affects cell division, differentiation, and secretion. Mutations in this gene, most commonly the V600E mutation, are the most frequently identified cancer-causing mutations in melanoma, and have been identified in various other cancers as well, including non-Hodgkin lymphoma, colorectal cancer, thyroid carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, hairy cell leukemia and adenocarcinoma of lung. Mutations in this gene are also associated with cardiofaciocutaneous, Noonan, and Costello syndromes, which exhibit overlapping phenotypes. A pseudogene of this gene has been identified on the X chromosome. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
BA1
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | NM_001374258.1 | c.1503A>G | p.Gln501= | synonymous_variant | 12/20 | ENST00000644969.2 | NP_001361187.1 | |
BRAF | NM_004333.6 | c.1383A>G | p.Gln461= | synonymous_variant | 11/18 | ENST00000646891.2 | NP_004324.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRAF | ENST00000644969.2 | c.1503A>G | p.Gln501= | synonymous_variant | 12/20 | NM_001374258.1 | ENSP00000496776 | |||
BRAF | ENST00000646891.2 | c.1383A>G | p.Gln461= | synonymous_variant | 11/18 | NM_004333.6 | ENSP00000493543 | P4 | ||
ENST00000700122.1 | n.502+6757T>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00367 AC: 559AN: 152174Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
559
AN:
152174
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000891 AC: 224AN: 251426Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000640 AC XY: 87AN XY: 135880
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
224
AN:
251426
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
135880
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000441 AC: 645AN: 1461818Hom.: 6 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000378 AC XY: 275AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
645
AN:
1461818
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
275
AN XY:
727214
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00368 AC: 561AN: 152292Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00355 AC XY: 264AN XY: 74470
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
561
AN:
152292
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
264
AN XY:
74470
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 13, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2024 | BRAF: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Greenwood Genetic Center Diagnostic Laboratories, Greenwood Genetic Center | Jan 15, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Aug 03, 2011 | Gln461Gln in exon 11 of BRAF: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located near a splice junction. In addition, this variant has been reported to have a freque ncy of 1.5% in the general population (Greenman 2007, Velangi 2004, Davies 2002, rs56216404). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Mar 03, 2014 | - - |
RASopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen RASopathy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Apr 18, 2017 | The filtering allele frequency of the c.1383A>G (p.Gln461=) variant in the BRAF gene is 0.986% (120/10404) of African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium, which is a high enough frequency to be classified as benign based on thresholds defined by the ClinGen RASopathy Expert Panel (BA1; PMID:29493581) - |
Noonan syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
LEOPARD syndrome 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 04, 2018 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Noonan syndrome and Noonan-related syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Nov 13, 2020 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at