rs56252953

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):​c.2127T>C​(p.Ile709=) variant causes a splice region, synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000317 in 1,603,762 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. IT709?) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00043 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 splice_region, synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.806
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.76).
BP6
Variant 11-108256217-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108256217-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 135742.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-108256217-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.806 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000433 (66/152300) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0123 (64/5192). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00991. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 37 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2127T>C p.Ile709= splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant 14/63 ENST00000675843.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2127T>C p.Ile709= splice_region_variant, synonymous_variant 14/63 NM_000051.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000440
AC:
67
AN:
152182
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0125
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00134
AC:
334
AN:
249924
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00121
AC XY:
163
AN XY:
135134
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0183
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000329
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000165
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000305
AC:
442
AN:
1451462
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000285
AC XY:
206
AN XY:
722174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0107
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000236
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000181
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000301
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000433
AC:
66
AN:
152300
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000497
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0123
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000427
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000529
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3472

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Ile709= variant was identified in 2 of 200 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.01) from individuals or families with Hodgkin Disease from Canadian and Japanese pediatric patients, and was not identified in 200 control chromosomes from healthy individuals (Sipahimalani 2007, Takagi 2017). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56252953) as “with uncertain significance, other allele”; in ClinVar and Clinvitae databases as benign by Invitae, GeneDx, as likely benign by Ambry Genetics and as uncertain significance by Illumina Clinical Services. In addition, the variant was identified in the 1000 Genomes Project in 8 of 5000 chromosomes (frequency: 0.002). The variant was identified in control databases in 354 (1 homozygous) of 275790 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.001 in the following populations: East Asian in 351of 18624 chromosomes (freq. 0.02), South Asian in 1 of 30600 chromosomes (freq. 0.00003), other in 2 of 6418 chromosomes (freq. 0.0003), but was not seen in African, Latino, European Non-Finnish, Ashkenazi Jewish, and European Finnish populations, increasing the likelihood that this may be a low frequency benign variant in certain populations of origin (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, ATM-LOVD, databases or in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project. The p.Ile709Ile variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information this variant meets our laboratory's criteria to be classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 27, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 31, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMay 03, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 03, 2018Variant summary: ATM c.2127T>C (p.Ile709Ile) alters a non-conserved nucleotide located close to a canonical splice site and therefore could affect mRNA splicing, leading to a significantly altered protein sequence. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0013 in 275790 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.019 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 18.99 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2127T>C in individuals affected with Breast Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jan 13, 2020- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingTrue Health DiagnosticsOct 26, 2017- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 03, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 14, 2015- -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioMar 01, 2022- -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.May 07, 2024This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.76
CADD
Benign
4.7
DANN
Benign
0.79

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56252953; hg19: chr11-108126944; API