rs562572079
Variant names:
Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001378452.1(ITPR1):c.2733G>A(p.Ala911Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000676 in 1,612,624 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000098 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000064 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
ITPR1
NM_001378452.1 synonymous
NM_001378452.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.58
Publications
1 publications found
Genes affected
ITPR1 (HGNC:6180): (inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1) This gene encodes an intracellular receptor for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Upon stimulation by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, this receptor mediates calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum. Mutations in this gene cause spinocerebellar ataxia type 15, a disease associated with an heterogeneous group of cerebellar disorders. Multiple transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2009]
ITPR1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
- aniridia-cerebellar ataxia-intellectual disability syndromeInheritance: AD, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, ClinGen
- spinocerebellar ataxia type 29Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
- spinocerebellar ataxia type 15/16Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 3-4675202-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-4675202-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 447582.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.58 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000985 (15/152304) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00104 (5/4820). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000408. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 12 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITPR1 | NM_001378452.1 | c.2733G>A | p.Ala911Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 23 of 62 | ENST00000649015.2 | NP_001365381.1 | |
| ITPR1 | NM_001168272.2 | c.2688G>A | p.Ala896Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 22 of 61 | NP_001161744.1 | ||
| ITPR1 | NM_001099952.4 | c.2733G>A | p.Ala911Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 23 of 59 | NP_001093422.2 | ||
| ITPR1 | NM_002222.7 | c.2688G>A | p.Ala896Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 22 of 58 | NP_002213.5 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITPR1 | ENST00000649015.2 | c.2733G>A | p.Ala911Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 23 of 62 | NM_001378452.1 | ENSP00000497605.1 | |||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000354582.12 | c.2733G>A | p.Ala911Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 23 of 62 | 5 | ENSP00000346595.8 | |||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000648266.1 | c.2733G>A | p.Ala911Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 23 of 62 | ENSP00000498014.1 | ||||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000650294.1 | c.2688G>A | p.Ala896Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 22 of 61 | ENSP00000498056.1 | ||||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000443694.5 | c.2688G>A | p.Ala896Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 22 of 61 | 1 | ENSP00000401671.2 | |||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000648309.1 | c.2688G>A | p.Ala896Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 20 of 59 | ENSP00000497026.1 | ||||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000357086.10 | c.2733G>A | p.Ala911Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 23 of 59 | 1 | ENSP00000349597.4 | |||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000456211.8 | c.2688G>A | p.Ala896Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 22 of 58 | 1 | ENSP00000397885.2 | |||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000648038.1 | c.570G>A | p.Ala190Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 4 of 42 | ENSP00000497872.1 | ||||
| ITPR1 | ENST00000648431.1 | c.60G>A | p.Ala20Ala | synonymous_variant | Exon 1 of 39 | ENSP00000498149.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000986 AC: 15AN: 152186Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152186
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000928 AC: 23AN: 247720 AF XY: 0.000127 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
247720
AF XY:
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000644 AC: 94AN: 1460320Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000798 AC XY: 58AN XY: 726388 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
94
AN:
1460320
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
726388
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
33418
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
44486
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
39646
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
66
AN:
85852
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
53362
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
1111344
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
60330
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.448
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
11
17
22
28
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000985 AC: 15AN: 152304Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74466 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
15
AN:
152304
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
41556
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
15302
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
4
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Mar 15, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
not provided Benign:1
Sep 06, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.