rs56287471
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_002187.3(IL12B):c.283G>A(p.Glu95Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00031 in 1,614,144 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E95D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002187.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL12B | NM_002187.3 | c.283G>A | p.Glu95Lys | missense_variant | 3/8 | ENST00000231228.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IL12B | ENST00000231228.3 | c.283G>A | p.Glu95Lys | missense_variant | 3/8 | 1 | NM_002187.3 | P1 | |
IL12B | ENST00000696750.1 | c.-148-2615G>A | intron_variant | ||||||
IL12B | ENST00000696751.1 | c.283G>A | p.Glu95Lys | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 3/7 | ||||
ENST00000521472.6 | n.290-2399C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00139 AC: 212AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000378 AC: 95AN: 251394Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000243 AC XY: 33AN XY: 135856
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000197 AC: 288AN: 1461838Hom.: 3 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000182 AC XY: 132AN XY: 727222
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00139 AC: 212AN: 152306Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00115 AC XY: 86AN XY: 74480
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases due to complete IL12B deficiency Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 28, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomics, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago | Mar 30, 2021 | IL12B NM_002187.2 exon 3 p.Glu95Lys (c.283G>A): This variant has not been reported in the literature but is present in 0.5% (131/24968) of African alleles in the Genome Aggregation Database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/5-158750143-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r2_1). This variant is present in ClinVar (Variation ID:541841). This variant amino acid Lysine (Lys) is present in >15 species including mammals and is not well conserved among evolutionarily distant species; this suggests that this variant may not impact the protein. Additional computational prediction tools do not suggest an impact. In summary, data on this variant is insufficient for disease classification. Therefore, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
IL12B-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 18, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at