rs56290406
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_022089.4(ATP13A2):c.1005C>T(p.Ala335=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0337 in 1,612,546 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,103 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.039 ( 144 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.033 ( 959 hom. )
Consequence
ATP13A2
NM_022089.4 synonymous
NM_022089.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -4.46
Genes affected
ATP13A2 (HGNC:30213): (ATPase cation transporting 13A2) This gene encodes a member of the P5 subfamily of ATPases which transports inorganic cations as well as other substrates. Mutations in this gene are associated with Kufor-Rakeb syndrome (KRS), also referred to as Parkinson disease 9. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Nov 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 1-17000045-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-17000045-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 128463.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-17000045-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-17000045-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.46 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0624 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP13A2 | NM_022089.4 | c.1005C>T | p.Ala335= | synonymous_variant | 11/29 | ENST00000326735.13 | NP_071372.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP13A2 | ENST00000326735.13 | c.1005C>T | p.Ala335= | synonymous_variant | 11/29 | 1 | NM_022089.4 | ENSP00000327214 | A1 | |
ENST00000446261.1 | n.188-4598G>A | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0389 AC: 5914AN: 152150Hom.: 144 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5914
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0263 AC: 6501AN: 246884Hom.: 125 AF XY: 0.0256 AC XY: 3434AN XY: 134222
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6501
AN:
246884
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3434
AN XY:
134222
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0332 AC: 48442AN: 1460278Hom.: 959 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0322 AC XY: 23387AN XY: 726286
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
48442
AN:
1460278
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
23387
AN XY:
726286
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0389 AC: 5918AN: 152268Hom.: 144 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0381 AC XY: 2836AN XY: 74452
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5918
AN:
152268
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2836
AN XY:
74452
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
38
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jun 29, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 15, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | May 15, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 17, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Kufor-Rakeb syndrome;C5567893:Autosomal recessive spastic paraplegia type 78 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 18, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Kufor-Rakeb syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at