rs56310996
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.852+14C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.143 in 1,594,382 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17,145 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000393.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL5A2 | NM_000393.5 | c.852+14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 12 of 53 | ENST00000374866.9 | NP_000384.2 | ||
COL5A2 | XM_011510573.4 | c.714+14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 15 of 56 | XP_011508875.1 | |||
COL5A2 | XM_047443251.1 | c.714+14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 17 of 58 | XP_047299207.1 | |||
COL5A2 | XM_047443252.1 | c.714+14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 16 of 57 | XP_047299208.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COL5A2 | ENST00000374866.9 | c.852+14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 12 of 53 | 1 | NM_000393.5 | ENSP00000364000.3 | |||
COL5A2 | ENST00000618828.1 | c.222+14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 12 of 46 | 5 | ENSP00000482184.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.142 AC: 21603AN: 151976Hom.: 1527 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.143 AC: 35962AN: 251038Hom.: 2801 AF XY: 0.148 AC XY: 20145AN XY: 135674
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.143 AC: 206569AN: 1442290Hom.: 15621 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.146 AC XY: 104683AN XY: 718798
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.142 AC: 21610AN: 152092Hom.: 1524 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.143 AC XY: 10639AN XY: 74334
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2 Benign:2
- -
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:2
- -
Variant summary: c.852+14C>T in COL5A2 gene is an intronic change that involves a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/5 programs in Alamut predict that this variant does not affect a normal splicing pattern, however no functional studies supporting this notion were published at the time of evaluation. The variant is present in the control population dataset of ExAC at frequency of 0.1446 (17522 /121190 chrs tested) including numerous homozygous occurrences. The observed frequencies exceed the maximum expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant of 0.0000063 suggesting that it is a benign polymorphism. The variant of interest has been cited as Benign/Likely Benign by multiple reputable databases/clinical laboratory. Taking together, based on the prevalence of this variant in general population the variant was classified as Benign. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A Benign:1
- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1 Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at