rs56316209
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000543632.5(MYO3A):āc.1894C>Gā(p.Leu632Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00447 in 1,612,298 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 251 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/14 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L632P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000543632.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO3A | NM_017433.5 | c.4848C>G | p.Ser1616Ser | synonymous_variant | 35/35 | ENST00000642920.2 | NP_059129.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYO3A | ENST00000642920.2 | c.4848C>G | p.Ser1616Ser | synonymous_variant | 35/35 | NM_017433.5 | ENSP00000495965.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0228 AC: 3465AN: 152186Hom.: 137 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00615 AC: 1535AN: 249400Hom.: 50 AF XY: 0.00473 AC XY: 639AN XY: 135166
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00254 AC: 3711AN: 1459994Hom.: 108 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00223 AC XY: 1619AN XY: 725924
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0230 AC: 3504AN: 152304Hom.: 143 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0231 AC XY: 1723AN XY: 74482
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | May 07, 2012 | Ser1616Ser in Exon 35 of MYO3A: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located with in the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 6.8% (256/3738) of African American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequenci ng Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs56316209). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 23, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 12, 2018 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 30 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 20, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at