rs563219502
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_001035.3(RYR2):āc.8367T>Cā(p.Ile2789=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000849 in 1,542,258 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00012 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000081 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous
NM_001035.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.144
Genes affected
RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 1-237660878-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237660878-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 201178.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.144 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 19 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | NM_001035.3 | c.8367T>C | p.Ile2789= | synonymous_variant | 56/105 | ENST00000366574.7 | NP_001026.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR2 | ENST00000366574.7 | c.8367T>C | p.Ile2789= | synonymous_variant | 56/105 | 1 | NM_001035.3 | ENSP00000355533 | P1 | |
RYR2 | ENST00000660292.2 | c.8367T>C | p.Ile2789= | synonymous_variant | 56/106 | ENSP00000499787 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000659194.3 | c.8367T>C | p.Ile2789= | synonymous_variant | 56/105 | ENSP00000499653 | ||||
RYR2 | ENST00000609119.2 | c.8367T>C | p.Ile2789= | synonymous_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 56/104 | 5 | ENSP00000499659 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152088Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
152088
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000518 AC: 8AN: 154502Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000490 AC XY: 4AN XY: 81702
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
8
AN:
154502
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
81702
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000806 AC: 112AN: 1390170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000832 AC XY: 57AN XY: 685446
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
112
AN:
1390170
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
685446
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000125 AC: 19AN: 152088Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000108 AC XY: 8AN XY: 74282
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
19
AN:
152088
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74282
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 16, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 09, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Oct 21, 2018 | - - |
Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 13, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 31, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at