rs56324595

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001267550.2(TTN):​c.105769G>A​(p.Glu35257Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0175 in 1,613,672 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 315 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 30 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.018 ( 285 hom. )

Consequence

TTN
NM_001267550.2 missense

Scores

1
6
9

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:25

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.17
Variant links:
Genes affected
TTN (HGNC:12403): (titin) This gene encodes a large abundant protein of striated muscle. The product of this gene is divided into two regions, a N-terminal I-band and a C-terminal A-band. The I-band, which is the elastic part of the molecule, contains two regions of tandem immunoglobulin domains on either side of a PEVK region that is rich in proline, glutamate, valine and lysine. The A-band, which is thought to act as a protein-ruler, contains a mixture of immunoglobulin and fibronectin repeats, and possesses kinase activity. An N-terminal Z-disc region and a C-terminal M-line region bind to the Z-line and M-line of the sarcomere, respectively, so that a single titin molecule spans half the length of a sarcomere. Titin also contains binding sites for muscle associated proteins so it serves as an adhesion template for the assembly of contractile machinery in muscle cells. It has also been identified as a structural protein for chromosomes. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. Considerable variability exists in the I-band, the M-line and the Z-disc regions of titin. Variability in the I-band region contributes to the differences in elasticity of different titin isoforms and, therefore, to the differences in elasticity of different muscle types. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, and autoantibodies to titin are produced in patients with the autoimmune disease scleroderma. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), TTN. . Gene score misZ -1.1021 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 6.9794 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with dilated cardiomyopathy, tibial muscular dystrophy, early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy, autosomal recessive centronuclear myopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 9, TTN-related myopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy 1G, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure, familial isolated dilated cardiomyopathy, childhood-onset progressive contractures-limb-girdle weakness-muscle dystrophy syndrome, autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0049339235).
BP6
Variant 2-178530846-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-178530846-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 47699.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-178530846-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr2-178530846-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0132 (2003/151988) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0201 (1364/67986). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0192. There are 30 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 972 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 30 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TTNNM_001267550.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.105769G>A p.Glu35257Lys missense_variant 358/363 ENST00000589042.5 NP_001254479.2 A0A0A0MTS7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TTNENST00000589042.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.105769G>A p.Glu35257Lys missense_variant 358/3635 NM_001267550.2 ENSP00000467141.1 A0A0A0MTS7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0132
AC:
2003
AN:
151870
Hom.:
30
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00327
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00548
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00980
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0201
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0120
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0136
AC:
3399
AN:
249016
Hom.:
37
AF XY:
0.0135
AC XY:
1817
AN XY:
135068
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00284
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00617
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0129
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000557
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0248
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0204
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0179
AC:
26167
AN:
1461684
Hom.:
285
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0175
AC XY:
12708
AN XY:
727120
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00233
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00633
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0134
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000756
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00332
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0254
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0205
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0155
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0132
AC:
2003
AN:
151988
Hom.:
30
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0131
AC XY:
972
AN XY:
74256
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00326
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0102
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00980
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0252
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0201
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0118
Alfa
AF:
0.0187
Hom.:
41
Bravo
AF:
0.0117
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0200
AC:
74
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0200
AC:
77
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00237
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0175
AC:
144
ExAC
AF:
0.0139
AC:
1682
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00231
AC:
8
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0187
EpiControl
AF:
0.0196

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:25
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsApr 25, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago-Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 24, 2012Glu32689Lys in exon 307 of TTN: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 1.7% (113/6610) of European America n chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (htt p://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/rs56324595). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 11, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 27, 2020- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 24, 2012This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchBiesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of HealthJun 24, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 07, 2023- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Myopathy, myofibrillar, 9, with early respiratory failure Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Tibial muscular dystrophy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabSep 10, 2021- -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 16, 2013This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.33
CADD
Benign
21
DANN
Benign
0.93
Eigen
Uncertain
0.61
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.61
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D;.;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0049
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.53
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.97
.;.;.;L;.;.;L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.51
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.6
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.31
Sift
Benign
0.030
D;D;.;.;D;D;.
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.;.;D
Vest4
0.35
MPC
0.48
ClinPred
0.027
T
GERP RS
5.0

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56324595; hg19: chr2-179395573; API