rs56343250

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_000685.5(AGTR1):c.*40A>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000998 in 1,609,418 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00099 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

AGTR1
NM_000685.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.48

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

AGTR1 (HGNC:336): (angiotensin II receptor type 1) Angiotensin II is a potent vasopressor hormone and a primary regulator of aldosterone secretion. It is an important effector controlling blood pressure and volume in the cardiovascular system. It acts through at least two types of receptors. This gene encodes the type 1 receptor which is thought to mediate the major cardiovascular effects of angiotensin II. This gene may play a role in the generation of reperfusion arrhythmias following restoration of blood flow to ischemic or infarcted myocardium. It was previously thought that a related gene, denoted as AGTR1B, existed; however, it is now believed that there is only one type 1 receptor gene in humans. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2020]

AGTR1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

renal tubular dysgenesis of genetic origin
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
essential hypertension, genetic
Inheritance: Unknown Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

AGTR1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00104 (159/152320) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00196 (133/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00168. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 70 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR,Unknown gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AGTR1	NM_000685.5 link	c.*40A>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 3	ENST00000349243.8	NP_000676.1	P30556Q53YY0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
AGTR1	ENST00000349243.8 link	c.*40A>T		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 3 of 3	1	NM_000685.5	ENSP00000273430.3		P30556

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00104

AC:

159

AN:

152202

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000965

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0110

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000288

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000753

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00195

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000880

AC:

220

AN:

249938

AF XY:

0.000893

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000397

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000647

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00168

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000989

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000993

AC:

1447

AN:

1457098

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00102

AC XY:

742

AN XY:

725252

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000150

AC:

AN:

33328

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

44708

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000690

AC:

AN:

26104

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39672

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86116

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000449

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000174

AC:

AN:

5758

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00122

AC:

1349

AN:

1107772

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000664

AC:

AN:

60224

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.493

Heterozygous variant carriers

170

254

339

424

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

114

152

190

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00104

AC:

159

AN:

152320

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000940

AC XY:

AN XY:

74474

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000962

AC:

AN:

41572

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000131

AC:

AN:

15296

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000288

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000753

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00196

AC:

133

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00204

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000865

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Renal tubular dysgenesis

Uncertain:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. However, the evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was not sufficient to rule this variant in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

2.6

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.75

PhyloP100

1.5

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over