rs56357060

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM1BP4_StrongBS2

The NM_000350.3(ABCA4):​c.4297G>A​(p.Val1433Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00254 in 1,614,254 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

ABCA4
NM_000350.3 missense

Scores

1
4
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:12B:1O:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.785
Variant links:
Genes affected
ABCA4 (HGNC:34): (ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 4) The membrane-associated protein encoded by this gene is a member of the superfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. ABC proteins transport various molecules across extra- and intracellular membranes. ABC genes are divided into seven distinct subfamilies (ABC1, MDR/TAP, MRP, ALD, OABP, GCN20, White). This protein is a member of the ABC1 subfamily. Members of the ABC1 subfamily comprise the only major ABC subfamily found exclusively in multicellular eukaryotes. This protein is a retina-specific ABC transporter with N-retinylidene-PE as a substrate. It is expressed exclusively in retina photoreceptor cells, and the gene product mediates transport of an essental molecule, all-trans-retinal aldehyde (atRAL), across the photoreceptor cell membrane. Mutations in this gene are found in patients diagnosed with Stargardt disease, a form of juvenile-onset macular degeneration. Mutations in this gene are also associated with retinitis pigmentosa-19, cone-rod dystrophy type 3, early-onset severe retinal dystrophy, fundus flavimaculatus, and macular degeneration age-related 2. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2019]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 6 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 1 uncertain in NM_000350.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0137170255).
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ABCA4NM_000350.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.4297G>A p.Val1433Ile missense_variant 29/50 ENST00000370225.4 NP_000341.2 P78363Q6AI28
ABCA4XM_047416704.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.4075G>A p.Val1359Ile missense_variant 28/49

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ABCA4ENST00000370225.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4297G>A p.Val1433Ile missense_variant 29/501 NM_000350.3 ENSP00000359245.3 P78363

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00185
AC:
281
AN:
152248
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000916
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00203
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000659
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00276
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00161
AC:
406
AN:
251484
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00164
AC XY:
223
AN XY:
135918
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000738
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000992
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00185
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000229
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000647
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00240
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00179
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00262
AC:
3827
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00256
AC XY:
1864
AN XY:
727246
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000508
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00214
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000580
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00195
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00184
AC:
281
AN:
152366
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00168
AC XY:
125
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000914
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000659
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00276
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.00256
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00177
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00458
AC:
17
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00311
AC:
12
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00256
AC:
22
ExAC
AF:
0.00143
AC:
173
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000866
AC:
3
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00294
EpiControl
AF:
0.00249

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:12Benign:1Other:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:8Benign:1Other:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyRetina International-- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ABCA4 p.Val1433Ile variant was identified in 9 of 1492 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from individuals or families with stargardt disease, cone-rod dystrophy, age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa (Schulz_2017_PMID:28118664; Thiadens_2012_PMID:22264887; Aguirre-Lamban_2009_PMID:19028736; Baum_2003_PMID:12592048; Lewis_1999_PMID:9973280). The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs56357060), ClinVar (classified as likely pathogenic by Institute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg and as a VUS by EGL Genetic Diagnostics and Illumina) and in LOVD 3.0 (classified as pathogenic once, a VUS four times and likely benign twice). The variant was also identified in control databases in 470 of 282886 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001661 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European (non-Finnish) in 322 of 129192 chromosomes (freq: 0.002492), Other in 14 of 7226 chromosomes (freq: 0.001937), East Asian in 35 of 19952 chromosomes (freq: 0.001754), Latino in 56 of 35440 chromosomes (freq: 0.00158), European (Finnish) in 19 of 25118 chromosomes (freq: 0.000756), African in 16 of 24972 chromosomes (freq: 0.000641), South Asian in 7 of 30616 chromosomes (freq: 0.000229), and Ashkenazi Jewish in 1 of 10370 chromosomes (freq: 0.000096). The p.Val1433 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Feb 15, 2015- -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyNEI Ophthalmic Genomics Laboratory, National Institutes of Health-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2023ABCA4: PM1 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 04, 2019The ABCA4 variant c.4297G>A; p.Val1433Ile (rs56357060) is reported in the medical literature in individuals with ABCA4-related disease as well as age related macular degeneration in the compound heterozygous state in a few individuals, but often without an additional pathogenic variant (Aguirre-Lamban 2009, Klevering 2004, Lewis 1999, Michaelides 2007, Song 2011, Souied 2000, Taylor 2017, Thiadens 2012, Webster 2001). The variant is reported in the ClinVar database (Variation ID: 99274) and in the Genome Aggregation Database in the general population with an allele frequency of 0.2% (470/282886 alleles including 1 homozygote). The amino acid at this position is highly conserved but computational algorithms (PolyPhen-2, SIFT) predict this variant is tolerated. Considering available information, there is insufficient evidence to classify this variant with certainty. References: Aguirre-Lamban J et al. Molecular analysis of the ABCA4 gene for reliable detection of allelic variations in Spanish patients: identification of 21 novel variants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):614-21. Klevering BJ et al. Three families displaying the combination of Stargardt's disease with cone-rod dystrophy or retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 2004 Mar;111(3):546-53. Lewis RA et al. Genotype/Phenotype analysis of a photoreceptor-specific ATP-binding cassette transporter gene, ABCR, in Stargardt disease. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Feb;64(2):422-34. Michaelides M et al. ABCA4 mutations and discordant ABCA4 alleles in patients and siblings with bull's-eye maculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;91(12):1650-5. Song J et al. High-throughput retina-array for screening 93 genes involved in inherited retinal dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Nov 25;52(12):9053-60. Souied EH et al. ABCR gene analysis in familial exudative age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Jan;41(1):244-7. Taylor RL et al. Panel-Based Clinical Genetic Testing in 85 Children with Inherited Retinal Disease. Ophthalmology. 2017 Jul;124(7):985-991. Thiadens AA et al. Clinical course, genetic etiology, and visual outcome in cone and cone-rod dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 2012 Apr;119(4):819-26 Webster AR et al. An analysis of allelic variation in the ABCA4 gene. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 May;42(6):1179-89. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 26, 2022Observed in patients with Stargardt disease in published literature who were reported to have V1433I on the same allele (in cis) with other ABCA4 variants or seen phase unknown with two other pathogenic ABCA4 variants, therefore questioning the pathogenicity of V1433I (Klevering et al., 2004; Lambertus et al., 2016; Murro et al., 2017; Birtel et al., 2018); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22995991, 34073554, 22025579, 27527345, 28002570, 28430335, 34426522, 20981092, 35119454, 29555955, 33090715, 15494742, 28341476, 32037395, 24409374, 22264887, 9973280) -
ABCA4-related disorder Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017The ABCA4 c.4297G>A (p.Val1433Ile) missense variant has been reported in 14 studies in individuals with a range of ocular disorders (Lewis et al. 1999; Souied et al. 2000; Webster et al. 2001; Baum et al. 2003; Klevering et al. 2004; Valverde et al. 2007; Michaelides et al. 2007; Aguirre-Lamban et al. 2009; Kellner et al. 2009; Passerini et al. 2010; Song et al. 2011; Verdina et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2014; Grassmann et al. 2015). The p.Val1433Ile variant was found in a homozygous state in two individuals with Stargardt disease (STGD), in a compound heterozygous state in one individual with STGD and one with retinal degeneration. The variant was further reported in a complex compound heterozygous state in a patient with recessive cone-rod dystrophy (CRD), and in a heterozygous state in four patients with recessive CRD, three patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), and one patient each with STGD and bull’s eye maculopathy. Segregation analysis in one AMD family revealed that the variant did not segregate with disease. The variant was found in a heterozygous state in two of 484 controls and is reported at a frequency of 0.00441 in the Other population of the Exome Aggregation Consortium. Additionally, one homozygote is reported in the European (non-Finnish) population of the Exome Aggregation Consortium. Despite the evidence of causality, the discordant reports of lack of co-segregation of the variant with disease and the presence of an ostensibly healthy homozygote in the frequency databases present conflicting support for pathogenicity. The p.Val1433Ile variant is therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance but suspicious for pathogenicity for ABCA4-related disorders. This variant was observed by ICSL as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 11, 2024The ABCA4 c.4297G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Val1433Ile. This variant has been reported in the heterozygous state alone or with a second ABCA4 variant in individuals with Stargardt disease and cone-rod dystrophy (for example, see Lewis et al. 1999. PubMed: 9973280; Thiadens et al. 2012. PubMed: 22264887; Taylor et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28341476; Del Pozo-Valero et al. 2022. PubMed ID: 35119454). Of note, this variant has also been detected in an individual who also had a potential causative variant in the PROM1 gene (associated with a retinal disorder) (Song et al. 2011. PubMed: 22025579). However, this variant is reported in 0.25% of alleles in individuals of European (Non-Finnish) descent in gnomAD, including in several homozygous individuals in the latest gnomAD dataset (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-94030483-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4), which may be too common to be a primary cause of disease. Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Retinal dystrophy Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInstitute of Human Genetics, Univ. Regensburg, Univ. RegensburgJan 01, 2023- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchDept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya UniversityOct 01, 2023- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.067
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.039
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.17
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.23
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.23
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.32
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.25
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.067
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.37
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.2
.;M
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.96
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.60
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.094
T;T
Polyphen
0.94
.;P
Vest4
0.63
MVP
0.75
MPC
0.070
ClinPred
0.0088
T
GERP RS
2.3
Varity_R
0.063
gMVP
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs56357060; hg19: chr1-94496039; COSMIC: COSV64677249; COSMIC: COSV64677249; API