rs564446820

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_181426.2(CCDC39):c.1102A>G(p.Met368Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000586 in 1,552,408 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000061 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CCDC39
NM_181426.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.875

Variant links:

Genes affected

CCDC39 (HGNC:25244): (coiled-coil domain 39 molecular ruler complex subunit) The protein encoded by this gene is involved in the motility of cilia and flagella. The encoded protein is essential for the assembly of dynein regulatory and inner dynein arm complexes, which regulate ciliary beat. Defects in this gene are a cause of primary ciliary dyskinesia type 14 (CILD14). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2011]

CCDC39 links:

ENSG00000145075 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000145075 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008995414).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000614 (86/1400054) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00228 (84/36914). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00188. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 46 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 28. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CCDC39	NM_181426.2 link	c.1102A>G	p.Met368Val	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 20	ENST00000476379.6	NP_852091.1	Q9UFE4-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CCDC39	ENST00000476379.6 link	c.1102A>G	p.Met368Val	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 20	2	NM_181426.2	ENSP00000417960.2		Q9UFE4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000962

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000120

AC:

AN:

166146

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000160

AC XY:

AN XY:

87394

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000614

AC:

AN:

1400054

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000665

AC XY:

AN XY:

691254

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000344

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000328

AC:

AN:

152354

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74502

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000964

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ExAC

AF:

0.0000876

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Uncertain:1

Aug 28, 2021

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This sequence change replaces methionine with valine at codon 368 of the CCDC39 protein (p.Met368Val). The methionine residue is weakly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between methionine and valine. This variant is present in population databases (rs564446820, ExAC 0.4%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CCDC39-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 344272). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 14

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.065

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.38

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.34

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.93

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.0030

Eigen

Benign

-0.62

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.54

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.69

LIST_S2

Benign

0.75

M_CAP

Benign

0.024

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0090

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.95

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.3

PrimateAI

Benign

0.37

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.2

REVEL

Benign

0.090

Sift

Uncertain

0.017

Sift4G

Benign

0.52

Polyphen

0.027

Vest4

0.23

MutPred

0.19

Gain of glycosylation at S369 (P = 0.0113);

MVP

0.78

MPC

0.060

ClinPred

0.096

GERP RS

-1.2

Varity_R

0.16

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over