Menu
GeneBe

rs564605612

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate

The NM_007194.4(CHEK2):c.1451C>T(p.Pro484Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000119 in 1,593,666 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P484S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000092 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CHEK2
NM_007194.4 missense

Scores

2
10
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:14B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHEK2 (HGNC:16627): (checkpoint kinase 2) In response to DNA damage and replication blocks, cell cycle progression is halted through the control of critical cell cycle regulators. The protein encoded by this gene is a cell cycle checkpoint regulator and putative tumor suppressor. It contains a forkhead-associated protein interaction domain essential for activation in response to DNA damage and is rapidly phosphorylated in response to replication blocks and DNA damage. When activated, the encoded protein is known to inhibit CDC25C phosphatase, preventing entry into mitosis, and has been shown to stabilize the tumor suppressor protein p53, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1. In addition, this protein interacts with and phosphorylates BRCA1, allowing BRCA1 to restore survival after DNA damage. Mutations in this gene have been linked with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a highly penetrant familial cancer phenotype usually associated with inherited mutations in TP53. Also, mutations in this gene are thought to confer a predisposition to sarcomas, breast cancer, and brain tumors. This nuclear protein is a member of the CDS1 subfamily of serine/threonine protein kinases. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.08254403).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CHEK2NM_007194.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1451C>T p.Pro484Leu missense_variant 13/15 ENST00000404276.6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CHEK2ENST00000404276.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.1451C>T p.Pro484Leu missense_variant 13/151 NM_007194.4 P2O96017-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000375
AC:
57
AN:
152140
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00295
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000770
AC:
18
AN:
233788
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000935
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
128360
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000233
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000330
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000828
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000916
AC:
132
AN:
1441408
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000920
AC XY:
66
AN XY:
717600
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000600
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000232
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000802
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000367
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000374
AC:
57
AN:
152258
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000403
AC XY:
30
AN XY:
74436
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00294
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000103
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.000277
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000657
ExAC
AF:
0.000112
AC:
13
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:14Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:3Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 484 of the CHEK2 protein (p.Pro484Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs564605612, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer and/or mesothelioma (PMID: 21244692, 25186627, 31206626, 31780696, 34008015). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 140938). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant is likely to be disruptive. Experimental studies are conflicting or provide insufficient evidence to determine the effect of this variant on CHEK2 function (PMID: 30851065, 31780696). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylFeb 26, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsOct 17, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 09, 2023This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. -
not provided Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 10, 2023In the published literature, the variant has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 33471991 (2021) see also LOVD https://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants/CHEK2), 31742824 (2020), 31206626 (2019), 31780696 (2019), 25186627 (2015), and 21244692 (2011)). This variant has been reported to have no effect on CHEK2 DNA damage response (PMID: 30851065 (2019)), however additional studies are required to determine the global effect of this variant on CHEK2 protein function. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000081 (10/124182 chromosomes, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), is uninformative in assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is damaging. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo ClinicMar 07, 2022- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 30, 2023Observed in individuals with a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, as well as in controls (Le Calvez-Kelm et al., 2011; Tung et al., 2015; Capriotti et al., 2017; Yadav et al., 2017; Dutil et al., 2019; Dorling et al., 2021); Published functional studies are conflicting: DNA damage response and cell growth comparable to wildtype in a yeast-based assay (Delimitsou et al., 2019), but reduced stability and decreased kinase activity, with retained autophosphorylation, in a human cell line (Dutil et al., 2019); Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25186627, 21244692, 26787654, 27878467, 28102005, 31106920, 30851065, 31780696, 32310333, 31742824, 34008015, 22419737, 19782031, 33471991) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 31, 2023The p.P484L variant (also known as c.1451C>T), located in coding exon 12 of the CHEK2 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 1451. The proline at codon 484 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This alteration has been reported in 1/1303 breast cancer patients and was absent from 1109 healthy controls (Le Calvez-Kelm F et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Jan;13:R6). This variant was observed in 1/3251 individuals who met eligibility criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (Lerner-Ellis J et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2021 Mar;147:871-879). This alteration was detected in 1/1054 Hispanic BRCA1/2-negative probands with hereditary breast cancer and 0/1189 controls (Weitzel JN et al. Cancer, 2019 Aug;125:2829-2836). This variant was reported in 5/60,466 breast cancer cases and in 1/53,461 controls in another study (Dorling et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 02;384:428-439). In addition, this alteration has been detected in a cohort of 122 patients who underwent multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer after having previously tested negative for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (Yadav S et al. Fam. Cancer. 2017 07;16:319-328). This alteration behaved as functional in an in vivo, yeast-based growth rate assay (Delimitsou A et al. Hum. Mutat. 2019 05;40(5):631-648). However, another in vitro kinase assay showed p.P484L to be damaging (Dutil J et al. Sci. Rep. 2019 11;9(1):17769). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Nov 23, 2021- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 15, 2023This missense variant replaces proline with leucine at codon 484 of the CHEK2 protein. Computational prediction is inconclusive regarding the impact of this variant on protein structure and function (internally defined REVEL score threshold 0.5 < inconclusive < 0.7, PMID: 27666373). A functional study has demonstrated this variant to be benign in a yeast-based DNA damage repair assay (PMID: 30851065). This variant has been reported in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 21244692, 25186627, 31780696, Lovejoy 2018, 33471991), prostate cancer (PMID: 31214711), or had a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer (PMID: 31742824). This variant has also been identified in 22/265184 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not specified Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 30, 2023Variant summary: CHEK2 c.1451C>T (p.Pro484Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the protein kinase domain (IPR000719) of the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 8.2e-05 in 267402 control chromosomesm (gnomAD, Calvez-Kelm_2011). This frequency is not significantly higher than estimated for a pathogenic variant in CHEK2 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome (8.2e-05 vs 0.00031), allowing no conclusion about variant significance. c.1451C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast and other cancers (e.g. Young_2016, Calvez-Kelm_2011, Tung_2014, Yadav_2016, Dutil_2019, Shao_2019, Weitzel_2019, Dorling_2021, Cheung_2021), but have also been seen in individuals over age 70 with no history of cancer (FLOSSIES database). These data do not allow any conclusion about variant significance. Several publications report experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, with conflicting results. The variant was classified as benign following assessment in a yeast-based assay (Delimitsou_2019), but was shown to significantly reduce kinase activity when expressed in HEK293T cells (Duhl_2019). The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 21244692, 25186627, 26787654, 27878467, 30851065, 31206626, 31742824, 31780696, 33471991, 34008015). Ten ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: all have classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoOct 16, 2020DNA sequence analysis of the CHEK2 gene demonstrated a sequence change, c.1451C>T, in exon 13 that results in an amino acid change, p.Pro484Leu. This sequence change has been described in the gnomAD database with a frequency of 0.03% in the Latino sub-population (dbSNP rs564605612). The p.Pro484Leu change has been reported in individuals with breast cancer (PMIDs: 21244692, 25186627, 31780696). Functional studies have demonstrated conflicting results; Dutil et al., 2019 reported dramatically decreased levels of protein expression compared to wild type, while Delimitsou et al., 2019 reported that this variant did not have a substantial impact on protein function (PMIDs: 31780696, 30851065). The p.Pro484Leu change affects a highly conserved amino acid residue located in a domain of the CHEK2 protein that is known to be functional. In-silico pathogenicity prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen2, Align GVGD, REVEL) provide contradictory results for the p.Pro484Leu substitution. Due to these contrasting evidences, the clinical significance of the p.Pro484Leu change remains unknown at this time. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioJan 08, 2021- -
CHEK2-related condition Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJan 02, 2024The CHEK2 c.1451C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro484Leu. This variant has been observed in individuals with breast cancer, but its pathogenicity was not established (Le Calvez-Kelm et al. 2011. PubMed ID: 21244692; Tung et al. 2014. PubMed ID: 25186627; Yadav et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 27878467; Shao et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 31742824). An in vitro functional assay showed that this variant leads to decreased kinase activity (Dutil et al. 2019. PubMed ID: 31780696). This variant is reported in 0.026% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD and is interpreted as uncertain significance in ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/140938/). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Familial cancer of breast;C0346629:Colorectal cancer;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C0585442:Bone osteosarcoma;C1836482:Li-Fraumeni syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsAug 25, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.0026
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.050
Cadd
Pathogenic
30
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.35
T;.;T;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.57
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.60
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.066
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.083
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.12
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.3
M;.;M;.;M;.;M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.56
T
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-6.8
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.52
Sift
Uncertain
0.0080
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D;D;.;D;D;.;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D
Vest4
0.81
MutPred
0.77
Loss of disorder (P = 0.037);.;Loss of disorder (P = 0.037);.;Loss of disorder (P = 0.037);.;Loss of disorder (P = 0.037);.;.;
MVP
0.70
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.88
D
GERP RS
5.5
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.78
gMVP
0.74

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs564605612; hg19: chr22-29090030; API