rs565020131

Positions:

chr17-65557802-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):c.815+4A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000638 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

AXIN2
NM_004655.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.6455

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.94

Variant links:

Genes affected

AXIN2 (HGNC:904): (axin 2) The Axin-related protein, Axin2, presumably plays an important role in the regulation of the stability of beta-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway, like its rodent homologs, mouse conductin/rat axil. In mouse, conductin organizes a multiprotein complex of APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, and conductin, which leads to the degradation of beta-catenin. Apparently, the deregulation of beta-catenin is an important event in the genesis of a number of malignancies. The AXIN2 gene has been mapped to 17q23-q24, a region that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and other tumors. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

AXIN2 links:

ENSG00000266076 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000266076 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).

BP6

Variant 17-65557802-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-65557802-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 324680.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AXIN2	NM_004655.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.815+4A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		ENST00000307078.10	NP_004646.3	Q9Y2T1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
AXIN2	ENST00000307078.10 linkuse as main transcript	c.815+4A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		1	NM_004655.4	ENSP00000302625.5		Q9Y2T1
ENSG00000266076	ENST00000577662.1 linkuse as main transcript	n.*991+4A>G		splice_region_variant, intron_variant		2		ENSP00000462418.1		J3KSC3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00135

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000717

AC:

AN:

250972

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000737

AC XY:

AN XY:

135708

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000979

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000650

AC:

AN:

1461848

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000591

AC XY:

AN XY:

727234

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00212

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000989

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000525

AC:

AN:

152280

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000671

AC XY:

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000340

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome

Benign:2

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 02, 2024	- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Feb 18, 2022	- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Aug 17, 2023	This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Mar 22, 2023

In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

not specified

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Jul 31, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.60

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.49

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.2

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.65

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.45

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over