Menu
GeneBe

rs565020131

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):c.815+4A>G variant causes a splice donor region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000638 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000065 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

AXIN2
NM_004655.4 splice_donor_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.6455
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.94
Variant links:
Genes affected
AXIN2 (HGNC:904): (axin 2) The Axin-related protein, Axin2, presumably plays an important role in the regulation of the stability of beta-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway, like its rodent homologs, mouse conductin/rat axil. In mouse, conductin organizes a multiprotein complex of APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, and conductin, which leads to the degradation of beta-catenin. Apparently, the deregulation of beta-catenin is an important event in the genesis of a number of malignancies. The AXIN2 gene has been mapped to 17q23-q24, a region that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and other tumors. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 17-65557802-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-65557802-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 324680.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2, Likely_benign=2}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 7 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
AXIN2NM_004655.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.815+4A>G splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant ENST00000307078.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
AXIN2ENST00000307078.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.815+4A>G splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant 1 NM_004655.4 P1
AXIN2ENST00000375702.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.815+4A>G splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant 1
AXIN2ENST00000618960.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.815+4A>G splice_donor_region_variant, intron_variant 5
AXIN2ENST00000577278.1 linkuse as main transcript downstream_gene_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000460
AC:
7
AN:
152162
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000717
AC:
18
AN:
250972
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000737
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
135708
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000979
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000650
AC:
95
AN:
1461848
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000591
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000989
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000525
AC:
8
AN:
152280
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000671
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74464
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000340
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 02, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Feb 18, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 17, 2023This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 22, 2023In silico analysis supports that this variant does not alter splicing; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
Cadd
Benign
16
Dann
Benign
0.49
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.65
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.45
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs565020131; hg19: chr17-63553920; API