rs566313620
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_004655.4(AXIN2):c.1380T>C(p.Tyr460=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000336 in 1,567,814 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00021 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00035 ( 9 hom. )
Consequence
AXIN2
NM_004655.4 synonymous
NM_004655.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.898
Genes affected
AXIN2 (HGNC:904): (axin 2) The Axin-related protein, Axin2, presumably plays an important role in the regulation of the stability of beta-catenin in the Wnt signaling pathway, like its rodent homologs, mouse conductin/rat axil. In mouse, conductin organizes a multiprotein complex of APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), beta-catenin, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, and conductin, which leads to the degradation of beta-catenin. Apparently, the deregulation of beta-catenin is an important event in the genesis of a number of malignancies. The AXIN2 gene has been mapped to 17q23-q24, a region that shows frequent loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer, neuroblastoma, and other tumors. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer with defective mismatch repair. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).
BP6
?
Variant 17-65537656-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-65537656-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 415213.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-65537656-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-65537656-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.898 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00021 (32/152026) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00665 (32/4810). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00484. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 25 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 32 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXIN2 | NM_004655.4 | c.1380T>C | p.Tyr460= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | ENST00000307078.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AXIN2 | ENST00000307078.10 | c.1380T>C | p.Tyr460= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | 1 | NM_004655.4 | P1 | |
AXIN2 | ENST00000375702.5 | c.1380T>C | p.Tyr460= | synonymous_variant | 5/9 | 1 | |||
AXIN2 | ENST00000618960.4 | c.1380T>C | p.Tyr460= | synonymous_variant | 6/10 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000211 AC: 32AN: 151908Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
151908
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00101 AC: 181AN: 179760Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00146 AC XY: 141AN XY: 96272
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
181
AN:
179760
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
141
AN XY:
96272
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000350 AC: 495AN: 1415788Hom.: 9 Cov.: 82 AF XY: 0.000532 AC XY: 373AN XY: 700492
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
495
AN:
1415788
Hom.:
Cov.:
82
AF XY:
AC XY:
373
AN XY:
700492
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152026Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000336 AC XY: 25AN XY: 74310
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
32
AN:
152026
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74310
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Dec 12, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 23, 2019 | - - |
Oligodontia-cancer predisposition syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 30, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Jun 29, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 20, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at