rs567625495
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_001909.5(CTSD):c.636G>T(p.Leu212=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000118 in 1,614,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000020 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000011 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
CTSD
NM_001909.5 synonymous
NM_001909.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.63
Genes affected
CTSD (HGNC:2529): (cathepsin D) This gene encodes a member of the A1 family of peptidases. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple protein products. These products include the cathepsin D light and heavy chains, which heterodimerize to form the mature enzyme. This enzyme exhibits pepsin-like activity and plays a role in protein turnover and in the proteolytic activation of hormones and growth factors. Mutations in this gene play a causal role in neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-10 and may be involved in the pathogenesis of several other diseases, including breast cancer and possibly Alzheimer's disease. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 11-1757392-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-1757392-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 390903.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.63 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSD | NM_001909.5 | c.636G>T | p.Leu212= | synonymous_variant | 5/9 | ENST00000236671.7 | NP_001900.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTSD | ENST00000236671.7 | c.636G>T | p.Leu212= | synonymous_variant | 5/9 | 1 | NM_001909.5 | ENSP00000236671 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152276
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000478 AC: 12AN: 250784Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000368 AC XY: 5AN XY: 135826
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
12
AN:
250784
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135826
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000109 AC: 16AN: 1461798Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727198
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
16
AN:
1461798
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
727198
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152394Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74530
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
152394
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74530
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 11, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 07, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at