Menu
GeneBe

rs568451087

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000051.4(ATM):c.3919G>A(p.Gly1307Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000183 in 1,613,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G1307E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000072 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

ATM
NM_000051.4 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
ATM (HGNC:795): (ATM serine/threonine kinase) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the PI3/PI4-kinase family. This protein is an important cell cycle checkpoint kinase that phosphorylates; thus, it functions as a regulator of a wide variety of downstream proteins, including tumor suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1, checkpoint kinase CHK2, checkpoint proteins RAD17 and RAD9, and DNA repair protein NBS1. This protein and the closely related kinase ATR are thought to be master controllers of cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that are required for cell response to DNA damage and for genome stability. Mutations in this gene are associated with ataxia telangiectasia, an autosomal recessive disorder. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0055812).
BP6
Variant 11-108284399-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-108284399-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 142243.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr11-108284399-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000194 (284/1461674) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0031 (267/86238). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00279. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 204 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ATMNM_000051.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3919G>A p.Gly1307Arg missense_variant 26/63 ENST00000675843.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ATMENST00000675843.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.3919G>A p.Gly1307Arg missense_variant 26/63 NM_000051.4 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000789
AC:
12
AN:
152102
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000358
AC:
90
AN:
251256
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000515
AC XY:
70
AN XY:
135796
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000194
AC:
284
AN:
1461674
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000281
AC XY:
204
AN XY:
727134
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00310
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000180
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000723
AC:
11
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00228
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000882
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.000428
AC:
52
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ataxia-telangiectasia syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 22, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthOct 06, 2016- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpSep 14, 2020Variant summary: ATM c.3919G>A (p.Gly1307Arg) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00036 in 251256 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0029 within the South Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within South Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 3-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ATM causing Breast Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of South Asian origin. c.3919G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer including low grade glioma and breast cancer (e.g. Shayeghi_1998, Lu_2015, Mandelker_2017) but was also reported in non-cancer controls (e.g. Pritchard_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Breast Cancer. One submitter in LOVD reports co-occurrence of the variant with 2 undefined pathogenic variants and classifies it as benign. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as benign/likely benign and one ClinVar submitter (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioAug 19, 2019- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 27, 2020- -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The ATM p.Gly1307Arg variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the GeneInsight-COGR, Cosmic, or MutDB databases. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs568451087) as "With Likely benign allele", ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, and GeneDx), and LOVD 3.0 (1x) databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 94 of 276986 chromosomes (2 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.0003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was identified in the following populations: South Asian in 92 of 30782 chromosomes (freq: 0.003), Other in 1 of 6458 chromosomes (freq: 0.0002), and East Asian in 1 of 18852 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), while the variant was not observed in the African, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, or Finnish populations. The p.Gly1307 residue is not conserved in mammals and four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; however, this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 2 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing; this is not very predictive of pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingNational Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free StateApr 19, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.065
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
Cadd
Benign
17
Dann
Benign
0.42
Eigen
Benign
-0.68
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.53
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.76
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.70
T;T;.
M_CAP
Benign
0.028
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0056
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.50
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.13
Sift
Benign
0.62
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.097
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.16
.;B;B
Vest4
0.18, 0.25
MutPred
0.16
Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0456);Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0456);Gain of solvent accessibility (P = 0.0456);
MVP
0.66
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.032
T
GERP RS
1.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.040
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs568451087; hg19: chr11-108155126; API