rs568700183

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_017617.5(NOTCH1):c.4930C>T(p.Leu1644Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000593 in 1,549,554 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00061 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NOTCH1
NM_017617.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88

Variant links:

Genes affected

NOTCH1 (HGNC:7881): (notch receptor 1) This gene encodes a member of the NOTCH family of proteins. Members of this Type I transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple different domain types. Notch signaling is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway that regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells through binding of Notch family receptors to their cognate ligands. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed in the trans-Golgi network to generate two polypeptide chains that heterodimerize to form the mature cell-surface receptor. This receptor plays a role in the development of numerous cell and tissue types. Mutations in this gene are associated with aortic valve disease, Adams-Oliver syndrome, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

NOTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).

BP6

Variant 9-136504761-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-136504761-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 390445.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr9-136504761-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000466 (71/152346) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000867 (59/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00069. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 34 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 71 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NOTCH1	NM_017617.5 link	c.4930C>T	p.Leu1644Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 34	ENST00000651671.1	NP_060087.3	P46531
NOTCH1	XM_011518717.3 link	c.4207C>T	p.Leu1403Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 31		XP_011517019.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NOTCH1	ENST00000651671.1 link	c.4930C>T	p.Leu1644Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 26 of 34		NM_017617.5	ENSP00000498587.1		P46531

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152228

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000852

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000321

AC:

AN:

149592

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000335

AC XY:

AN XY:

80478

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000273

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000243

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000440

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000652

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000467

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000607

AC:

848

AN:

1397208

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000614

AC XY:

423

AN XY:

689144

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000630

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000363

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000126

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000212

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000749

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000397

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000466

AC:

AN:

152346

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000456

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000721

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000457

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000867

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.000529

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000589

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:6

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

NOTCH1: BP4, BP7 -

Nov 16, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 22, 2020

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 02, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:2

Feb 09, 2017

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 26, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 30, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Adams-Oliver syndrome 5

Benign:1

Dec 31, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

Jun 01, 2018

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.82

CADD

Benign

1.5

DANN

Benign

0.35

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over