Variant rs568801926 details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).

BP6

Variant 16-53622339-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53622339-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 260604.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=4}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.229 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	NM_015272.5 link	c.3312C>T	p.Pro1104Pro	synonymous_variant	23/27	ENST00000647211.2	NP_056087.2	Q68CZ1-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	ENST00000647211.2 link	c.3312C>T	p.Pro1104Pro	synonymous_variant	23/27		NM_015272.5	ENSP00000493946.1		Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000443

AC:

67

AN:

151408

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

30

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000729

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000394

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000677

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000362

AC:

33

AN:

91274

Hom.:

0

AF XY:

0.000355

AC XY:

18

AN XY:

50696

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000271

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000168

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000431

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000749

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000548

AC:

264

AN:

481474

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

0

AF XY:

0.000449

AC XY:

116

AN XY:

258220

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000959

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000778

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000795

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000366

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000443

AC:

67

AN:

151408

Hom.:

0

Cov.:

30

AF XY:

0.000447

AC XY:

33

AN XY:

73850

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000729

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000394

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000677

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000323

Hom.:

0

Bravo

AF:

0.000336

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Nov 01, 2023	RPGRIP1L: BP4, BP7 -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -

not specified

Benign:2

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	May 25, 2016	This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Joubert syndrome 7

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 5

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 8

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 29, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.92

CADD

Benign

5.2

DANN

Benign

0.56

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

rs568801926

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over