rs568801926

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):​c.3312C>T​(p.Pro1104Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000523 in 632,882 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. P1104P) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00044 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00055 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.229

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]
RPGRIP1L Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Meckel syndrome, type 5
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • Joubert syndrome 7
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • COACH syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Joubert syndrome with renal defect
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • Meckel syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.92).
BP6
Variant 16-53622339-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53622339-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 260604.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.229 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
RPGRIP1LNM_015272.5 linkc.3312C>T p.Pro1104Pro synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 27 ENST00000647211.2 NP_056087.2 Q68CZ1-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1LENST00000647211.2 linkc.3312C>T p.Pro1104Pro synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 27 NM_015272.5 ENSP00000493946.1 Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000443
AC:
67
AN:
151408
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000729
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000394
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00115
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000677
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000362
AC:
33
AN:
91274
AF XY:
0.000355
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000271
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000749
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000548
AC:
264
AN:
481474
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.000449
AC XY:
116
AN XY:
258220
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
13482
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000132
AC:
4
AN:
30192
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
18200
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
29080
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000959
AC:
5
AN:
52130
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000778
AC:
23
AN:
29548
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2298
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000795
AC:
222
AN:
279236
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000366
AC:
10
AN:
27308
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.482
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12
25
37
50
62
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000443
AC:
67
AN:
151408
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000447
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
73850
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000729
AC:
3
AN:
41160
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000394
AC:
6
AN:
15214
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5146
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4796
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
12
AN:
10402
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
314
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000677
AC:
46
AN:
67928
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2068
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
6
10
13
16
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000323
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000336

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Nov 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

RPGRIP1L: BP4, BP7 -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
May 25, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 7 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 8 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Joubert syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.92
CADD
Benign
5.2
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
0.23

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs568801926; hg19: chr16-53656251; API