rs5705

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000537.4(REN):ā€‹c.204A>Cā€‹(p.Thr68=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.133 in 1,613,772 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16,050 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.18 ( 2924 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes š‘“: 0.13 ( 13126 hom. )

Consequence

REN
NM_000537.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.627
Variant links:
Genes affected
REN (HGNC:9958): (renin) This gene encodes renin, an aspartic protease that is secreted by the kidneys. Renin is a part of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system involved in regulation of blood pressure, and electrolyte balance. This enzyme catalyzes the first step in the activation pathway of angiotensinogen by cleaving angiotensinogen to form angiotensin I, which is then converted to angiotensin II by angiotensin I converting enzyme. This cascade can result in aldosterone release, narrowing of blood vessels, and increase in blood pressure as angiotension II is a vasoconstrictive peptide. Transcript variants that encode different protein isoforms and that arise from alternative splicing and the use of alternative promoters have been described, but their full-length nature has not been determined. Mutations in this gene have been shown to cause hyperuricemic nephropathy familial juvenile 2, familial hyperproreninemia, and renal tubular dysgenesis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 1-204162058-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-204162058-T-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 256379.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-204162058-T-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.308 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RENNM_000537.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.204A>C p.Thr68= synonymous_variant 2/10 ENST00000272190.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RENENST00000272190.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.204A>C p.Thr68= synonymous_variant 2/101 NM_000537.4 P1P00797-1
RENENST00000638118.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.90A>C p.Thr30= synonymous_variant 4/125

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.179
AC:
27252
AN:
151926
Hom.:
2915
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.312
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.147
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.171
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.159
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0913
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.108
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.102
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.165
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.127
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.160
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.141
AC:
35385
AN:
251010
Hom.:
2866
AF XY:
0.136
AC XY:
18519
AN XY:
135672
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.319
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.181
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.157
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0882
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.113
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.112
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.124
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.132
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.128
AC:
187069
AN:
1461728
Hom.:
13126
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.128
AC XY:
92719
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.324
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.177
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.158
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0831
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.114
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.111
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.122
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.140
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.180
AC:
27304
AN:
152044
Hom.:
2924
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.178
AC XY:
13224
AN XY:
74322
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.312
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.171
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.159
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0913
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.108
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.102
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.127
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.160
Alfa
AF:
0.138
Hom.:
2601
Bravo
AF:
0.192
Asia WGS
AF:
0.134
AC:
468
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 05, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Renal tubular dysgenesis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
2.2
DANN
Benign
0.23

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5705; hg19: chr1-204131186; COSMIC: COSV65817452; API