rs571038432
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points: 18P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_172250.3(MMAA):c.988C>T(p.Arg330*) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000217 in 1,613,998 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_172250.3 stop_gained
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- methylmalonic aciduria, cblA typeInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 18 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_172250.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMAA | MANE Select | c.988C>T | p.Arg330* | stop_gained | Exon 7 of 7 | ENSP00000497008.1 | Q8IVH4 | ||
| MMAA | TSL:1 | n.*119C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000427422.1 | D6RIS5 | |||
| MMAA | TSL:1 | n.*119C>T | 3_prime_UTR | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000427422.1 | D6RIS5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152088Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000796 AC: 2AN: 251296 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000219 AC: 32AN: 1461792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000234 AC XY: 17AN XY: 727192 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000134 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74430 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at