rs571245328
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 1P and 2B. PP2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.26804C>Gā(p.Thr8935Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000959 in 1,563,960 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.26804C>G | p.Thr8935Arg | missense_variant | 93/363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 | |
LOC124906100 | XR_007087318.1 | n.2186-424G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.26804C>G | p.Thr8935Arg | missense_variant | 93/363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141 | P1 | |
TTN-AS1 | ENST00000659121.1 | n.503-21174G>C | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 151968Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000170 AC: 3AN: 176328Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000107 AC XY: 1AN XY: 93138
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000779 AC: 11AN: 1411992Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000574 AC XY: 4AN XY: 697246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 151968Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000270 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74180
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 17, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at