rs57153321
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_006158.5(NEFL):c.1402G>A(p.Asp468Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0014 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 8/12 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006158.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFL | NM_006158.5 | c.1402G>A | p.Asp468Asn | missense_variant | 3/4 | ENST00000610854.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEFL | ENST00000610854.2 | c.1402G>A | p.Asp468Asn | missense_variant | 3/4 | 1 | NM_006158.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000867 AC: 132AN: 152206Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00130 AC: 323AN: 248962Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 202AN XY: 135100
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00146 AC: 2129AN: 1461656Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00147 AC XY: 1070AN XY: 727098
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000867 AC: 132AN: 152324Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000819 AC XY: 61AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | Epithelial Biology; Institute of Medical Biology, Singapore | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 24, 2019 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 12566280, 22765307, 17052987) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Apr 01, 2023 | NEFL: BP4, BS1:Supporting - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Inherited Neuropathy Consortium | - | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre | - | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 10, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1F Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2E Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at