rs572063023
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS2_Supporting
The NM_004656.4(BAP1):c.206C>T(p.Thr69Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000223 in 1,612,114 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T69R) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004656.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Kury-Isidor syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, G2P
- renal cell carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP1 | NM_004656.4 | c.206C>T | p.Thr69Met | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 17 | ENST00000460680.6 | NP_004647.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP1 | ENST00000460680.6 | c.206C>T | p.Thr69Met | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 17 | 1 | NM_004656.4 | ENSP00000417132.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000284 AC: 7AN: 246296 AF XY: 0.0000375 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000199 AC: 29AN: 1459796Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000165 AC XY: 12AN XY: 725920 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152318Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74476 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome Uncertain:5Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.
This sequence change replaces threonine, which is neutral and polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 69 of the BAP1 protein (p.Thr69Met). This variant is present in population databases (rs572063023, gnomAD 0.009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BAP1-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 472690). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt BAP1 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
The BAP1 c.206C>T (p.Thr69Met) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.008% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but to our knowledge this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals with BAP1-related tumor predisposition syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance.?
not provided Uncertain:2
The BAP1 c.206C>T (p.Thr69Met) variant has not been reported in individuals with BAP1-related conditions in the published literature. The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000071 (9/126588 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using bioinformatics tools for the prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on protein structure and function yielded predictions that this variant is benign. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant.
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32181510)
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
This missense variant replaces threonine with methionine at codon 69 of the BAP1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has not been reported in individuals affected with BAP1-related disorders in the literature. This variant has been identified in 11/277704 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at