Menu
GeneBe

rs572886375

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_001292063.2(OTOG):c.6667G>A(p.Val2223Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000626 in 1,550,580 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. V2223V) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000062 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

OTOG
NM_001292063.2 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.248
Variant links:
Genes affected
OTOG (HGNC:8516): (otogelin) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the acellular membranes of the inner ear. Disruption of the orthologous mouse gene shows that it plays a role in auditory and vestibular functions. It is involved in fibrillar network organization, the anchoring of otoconial membranes and cupulae to the neuroepithelia, and likely in sound stimulation resistance. Mutations in this gene cause autosomal recessive nonsyndromic deafness, type 18B. Alternative splicing of this gene results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, May 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.019629031).
BP6
Variant 11-17629271-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17629271-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 227790.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=2, Likely_benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
OTOGNM_001292063.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6667G>A p.Val2223Met missense_variant 40/56 ENST00000399397.6
OTOGNM_001277269.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.6703G>A p.Val2235Met missense_variant 39/55

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
OTOGENST00000399397.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.6667G>A p.Val2223Met missense_variant 40/565 NM_001292063.2 P2
OTOGENST00000399391.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.6703G>A p.Val2235Met missense_variant 39/555 A2Q6ZRI0-1
OTOGENST00000342528.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.4005G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 16/222

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000657
AC:
10
AN:
152242
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000357
AC:
53
AN:
148440
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000275
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
80000
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000444
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000444
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000365
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000622
AC:
87
AN:
1398220
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000493
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
689628
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000190
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000560
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000167
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000172
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000656
AC:
10
AN:
152360
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000805
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74504
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000283
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000162
ExAC
AF:
0.0000463
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 08, 2016- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 24, 2022In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The methionine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 227790). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with OTOG-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (rs572886375, gnomAD 0.2%). This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with methionine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 2235 of the OTOG protein (p.Val2235Met). -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 02, 2016p.Val2235Met in exon 39 of OTOG: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note, 5 mammals (orangutan, rhesus, crab-eating macaque, baboon and green monkey ) have a methionine (Met) at this position despite high nearby amino acid conser vation. In addition, computational prediction tools do not suggest a high likeli hood of impact to the protein. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.083
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.56
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.59
Cadd
Benign
14
Dann
Benign
0.91
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.037
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.0
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.88
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.32
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.65
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.028
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.020
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.34
N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.098
Sift
Benign
0.10
T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;T
Vest4
0.17
MutPred
0.61
Loss of catalytic residue at V2235 (P = 0.0281);.;
MVP
0.17
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
-0.18
Varity_R
0.039
gMVP
0.31

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.13
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs572886375; hg19: chr11-17650818; API