Menu
GeneBe

rs573755164

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_001206927.2(DNAH8):c.3129T>A(p.Asp1043Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000525 in 1,562,082 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D1043V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000048 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNAH8
NM_001206927.2 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.12
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAH8 (HGNC:2952): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a heavy chain of an axonemal dynein involved in sperm and respiratory cilia motility. Axonemal dyneins generate force through hydrolysis of ATP and binding to microtubules. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010391355).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000482 (68/1409750) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00153 (68/44420). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00124. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 24 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAH8NM_001206927.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3129T>A p.Asp1043Glu missense_variant 23/93 ENST00000327475.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAH8ENST00000327475.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.3129T>A p.Asp1043Glu missense_variant 23/935 NM_001206927.2 P2
DNAH8ENST00000359357.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.2478T>A p.Asp826Glu missense_variant 21/912 A2Q96JB1-1
DNAH8ENST00000449981.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.3129T>A p.Asp1043Glu missense_variant 22/825

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000985
AC:
15
AN:
152214
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000982
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000200
AC:
50
AN:
250140
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135222
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00143
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000482
AC:
68
AN:
1409750
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.0000341
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
704384
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00153
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000919
AC:
14
AN:
152332
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000107
AC XY:
8
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000915
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000142
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000230
ExAC
AF:
0.000115
AC:
14
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 14, 2021The c.3129T>A (p.D1043E) alteration is located in exon 23 (coding exon 22) of the DNAH8 gene. This alteration results from a T to A substitution at nucleotide position 3129, causing the aspartic acid (D) at amino acid position 1043 to be replaced by a glutamic acid (E). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 12, 2024This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 1043 of the DNAH8 protein (p.Asp1043Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs573755164, gnomAD 0.2%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with DNAH8-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 454566). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Not Available"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available". The glutamic acid amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Spermatogenic failure 46 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingRevvity Omics, RevvityJun 29, 2020- -
DNAH8-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 13, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.65
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.70
Cadd
Benign
7.6
Dann
Benign
0.68
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0050
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.4
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.4
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.11
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.50
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0068
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.010
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.87
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
REVEL
Benign
0.069
Polyphen
0.0
.;.;B
Vest4
0.089
MutPred
0.22
.;.;Gain of loop (P = 0.1081);
MVP
0.30
MPC
0.11
ClinPred
0.024
T
GERP RS
-9.7
Varity_R
0.025
gMVP
0.087

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs573755164; hg19: chr6-38773351; COSMIC: COSV59425967; API