rs5744751
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.755C>T(p.Ala252Val) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0991 in 1,613,392 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,666 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.077 ( 602 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.10 ( 8064 hom. )
Consequence
POLE
NM_006231.4 missense
NM_006231.4 missense
Scores
1
1
16
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 5.64
Genes affected
POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0018293858).
BP6
Variant 12-132677409-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132677409-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 380210.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr12-132677409-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.108 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | NM_006231.4 | c.755C>T | p.Ala252Val | missense_variant | 8/49 | ENST00000320574.10 | NP_006222.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POLE | ENST00000320574.10 | c.755C>T | p.Ala252Val | missense_variant | 8/49 | 1 | NM_006231.4 | ENSP00000322570.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0770 AC: 11705AN: 152046Hom.: 602 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
11705
AN:
152046
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0860 AC: 21621AN: 251472Hom.: 1088 AF XY: 0.0872 AC XY: 11852AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
21621
AN:
251472
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
11852
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.101 AC: 148220AN: 1461228Hom.: 8064 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.100 AC XY: 72931AN XY: 726958
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
148220
AN:
1461228
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
72931
AN XY:
726958
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0769 AC: 11700AN: 152164Hom.: 602 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0760 AC XY: 5650AN XY: 74380
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
11700
AN:
152164
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
5650
AN XY:
74380
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
407
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
442
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
70
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
923
ExAC
AF:
AC:
10401
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
346
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 06, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 03, 2016 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 24, 2016 | Variant summary: The POLE c.755C>T (p.Ala252Val) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome (Mutation Taster not captured due to low p-value). This variant was found in 10401/121392 control chromosomes (545 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0856811, which is 6032 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic POLE variant (0.0000142), highly suggesting this variant is a benign polymorphism. The variant has been identified in patients, but not at a significantly higher frequency than in healthy controls (Kane_Cancer Res_2014). Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 21, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;.
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
B;B
Vest4
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at