rs5744752

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006231.4(POLE):c.779G>A(p.Arg260Gln) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000601 in 1,614,004 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R260G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 6 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00036 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

POLE
NM_006231.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.96

Publications

9 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

POLE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

POLE-related polyposis and colorectal cancer syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
facial dysmorphism-immunodeficiency-livedo-short stature syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
intrauterine growth retardation, metaphyseal dysplasia, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, genital anomalies, and immunodeficiency
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
IMAGe syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Polymerase proofreading-related adenomatous polyposis
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

POLE links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006913513).

BP6

Variant 12-132677385-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132677385-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 220642.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0029 (441/152280) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00975 (405/41550). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00896. There are 6 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 219 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 6 AD,AR gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006231.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Sel.	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	POLE	NM_006231.4	MANE Select	c.779G>A	p.Arg260Gln	missense	Exon 8 of 49	NP_006222.2	Q07864

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
POLE	ENST00000320574.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.779G>A	p.Arg260Gln	missense	Exon 8 of 49	ENSP00000322570.5	Q07864
POLE	ENST00000535270.5	TSL:1	c.698G>A	p.Arg233Gln	missense	Exon 7 of 48	ENSP00000445753.1	F5H1D6
POLE	ENST00000537064.5	TSL:1	n.779G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon	Exon 8 of 49	ENSP00000442578.1	F5H7E4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00287

AC:

436

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00966

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000843

AC:

212

AN:

251484

AF XY:

0.000655

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0102

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000809

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000109

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000362

AC:

529

AN:

1461724

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000351

AC XY:

255

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00929

AC:

311

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000760

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

39698

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000348

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53402

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00121

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000113

AC:

126

AN:

1111880

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000762

AC:

AN:

60386

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.468

Heterozygous variant carriers

105

131

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00290

AC:

441

AN:

152280

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00294

AC XY:

219

AN XY:

74440

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00975

AC:

405

AN:

41550

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00131

AC:

AN:

15292

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10604

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000147

AC:

AN:

68026

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00236

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.505

Heterozygous variant carriers

108

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00114

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00307

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000270

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0104

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00105

AC:

127

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Benign/Likely benign

Revision:criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (9)

not specified (4)

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome (2)

Colorectal cancer, susceptibility to, 12 (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.25

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.41

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.36

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.33

Eigen

Benign

-0.027

Eigen_PC

Benign

0.13

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.89

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0069

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.8

PhyloP100

5.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.48

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.7

REVEL

Benign

0.12

Sift

Uncertain

0.029

Sift4G

Benign

0.13

Polyphen

0.0060

Vest4

0.31

MVP

0.28

MPC

0.26

ClinPred

0.037

GERP RS

4.8

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.31

gMVP

0.60

Mutation Taster

=80/20

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over