rs5744801

Variant names:

• chr12-132668423-C-A
• rs5744801
• NM_006231.4:c.2106G>T

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

• chr12-132668423-C-A
• chr12-132668423-C-G
• chr12-132668423-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_006231.4(POLE):​c.2106G>T​(p.Gly702Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000356 in 1,612,620 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 (2 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.00020 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: POLE NM_006231.4 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9
• Conservation: PhyloP100: -0.248

Genes affected

POLE (HGNC:9177): (DNA polymerase epsilon, catalytic subunit) This gene encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase epsilon. The enzyme is involved in DNA repair and chromosomal DNA replication. Mutations in this gene have been associated with colorectal cancer 12 and facial dysmorphism, immunodeficiency, livedo, and short stature. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
• BP6: Variant 12-132668423-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-132668423-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 240425.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.248 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00182 (277/152334) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00642 (267/41584). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00579. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 124 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
POLE	NM_006231.4	c.2106G>T	p.Gly702Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 49	ENST00000320574.10	NP_006222.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
POLE	ENST00000320574.10	c.2106G>T	p.Gly702Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 19 of 49	1	NM_006231.4	ENSP00000322570.5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00182 AC: 277 AN: 152216 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00644

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.000458

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000552 AC: 138 AN: 250120 Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000399 AC XY: 54 AN XY: 135178

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.00740

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.000467

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000203 AC: 297 AN: 1460286 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 118 AN XY: 726332

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00719

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.000540

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00000360

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.000481

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00182 AC: 277 AN: 152334 Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00166 AC XY: 124 AN XY: 74500

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00642

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.000457

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00142

Alfa AF: 0.000884 Hom.: 0

Bravo AF: 0.00232

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4

May 11, 2022

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Sep 11, 2018

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 29, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3

Jun 07, 2021

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2019

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: POLE c.2106G>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 4/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00055 in 250120 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0074 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 521 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in POLE causing Colorectal Cancer phenotype (1.4e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2106G>T in individuals affected with Colorectal Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Six submitters have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign (2x) /likely benign (4x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Aug 11, 2017

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2

Aug 12, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 27, 2018

True Health Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.50
CADD	Benign	8.0
DANN	Benign	0.57
RBP_binding_hub_radar		1.1
RBP_regulation_power_radar		2.8

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.060		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs5744801; hg19: chr12-133245009;